
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 51 OF 20151. MUKESH KUMARS/o. Late Shri Hari Krishna, R/o. House No. 1017, Second Floor, Sector - 46,Gurgaon ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.Through Its Managing Director, ...
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 52 OF 20151. HARKAMAL SINGH & ANR.C-7/231, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi - 110 053............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.Through Its Managing Director, ECE House, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New...
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 53 OF 20151. RAJAN CHHIBBA & ANR.R/o. D-6, Tower 3 New Moti Bagh New Delhi -110 023 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.Through Its Managing Director, ECE House, Kasturba Gandh...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 667 OF 20151. SEEMA CHUGH & ANR.N - 1004, Sispal Vihar Sector 49, Sohna Road GurgaonHaryana. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITEDECE House, 28 Kasturba Ganhi Marg,New Delhi 01........
Case Number: 667
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 670 OF 20151. AKSHAY CHANDWANI & ANR.C-284, SFS Flats, Shiekh Sarai Phase I, New Delhi - 17. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITEDECE House, 28 Kasturba Gandhi Marg,New Delhi- 01......
Case Number: 670
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 742 OF 20151. KABIR SARAFG-405, SURYA VIHAR, DUDAHERA,GURGAON............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. ECS HOUSE, 28 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG,NEW DELHI-110001............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:&...
Case Number: 742
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA MARAYAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 744 OF 20151. DECHEN C. THONDUPR/o. 37D, Pocket-C, Siddartha Extension,New Delhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. ECE House, 28 Kasturba Gandhi Marg,New Delhi - 01............Opp....
Case Number: 744
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 85 OF 20151. NEENA ROYCHOWDHURY & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER For the Complainan...
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 96 OF 20151. SATISH KUMAR & ANRR/o. Resident at M-171, First Floor, Blossoms - II, Sector-51, Gurgaon ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. & ANR.Through Its Managing Director, ECE Hou...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record...
Case Number: 607
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.