
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:255 of 2017Date of Institution:24.03.2017Date of Decision:18.09.2017Gagandeep Singh Toor son of Late Surjit Singh resident of 7 The Vale Heston, Hounslow (UK) TW59HT, Middlesex, United Kingdom.Tejpal ...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajmat Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:296 of 2017Date of Institution:06.04.2017Date of Decision:18.09.2017Sohan Singh Mankoo aged about 48 years S/o Amar Singh resident of Village Dhunda, Tehsil Bassi Pathana, District Fatehgarh Sahib.Viv...
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:357 of 2017Date of Institution:25.04.2017Date of Decision:18.09.2017Himanshu Misra S/o Sh. R.S.Misra, 25/2, Ganj Road, Shimla.Ms. Taruna Misra W/o Sh. HImanshu Misra, 25/2, Ganj Road, Shimla.…&...
Case Number: 357
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:66 of 2017Date of Institution:20.01.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017Sukhvinder s/o Sh. Om Parkash r/o House No.2773, 2nd Floor, Sector 21, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s u sEmaar MGF Land...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:67 of 2017Date of Institution:20.01.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017Rajender Kumar Mehta s/o Sh. Roop Chand Mehta r/o House No.376, First Floor, Sector 17, Panchkula.Bindu Arya w/o Sh. Rajender Kumar M...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ajitehwar Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:70 of 2017Date of Institution:20.01.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017Ankit Satija s/o Sh. Mahinder Kumar Satija, r/o Flat No.32, Sfs Flats, Pocket – 10, Sector 11, Rohini, New Delhi.Mahinder Kumar...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:97 of 2017Date of Institution:31.01.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017Devi Lal Banga S/o Sh. Atma Ram Banga r/o #1332/2, Sector 44-B, Chandigarh.Kiran Kumari Banga W/o Sh. Devi Lal Banga, r/o #1332/2, Se...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Polly Shera, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated that against order under execution, the judgment debtors filed First Appeal bearing No.1631 of 2017 before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, wherein, vide order dated 04.09.2017, subject to deposit of entire principal ...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER The property, in question, is situated in Punjab. Faced with this situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the proper Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare co...
Case Number: 657
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Krishan Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim aggarwal, Adv.
...
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.