
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARMANAND YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1222 OF 20161. DEVESH KATIYARFLAT NO. 902, TOWER-7, PARSVANATH GREEN VILLE, SOHNA ROAD, GURGAON, HARYANA............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED(THROUGH ITS MD) ECE HOUSE, KG MARG, NE...
Case Number: 1222
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1164 OF 20171. PRITHIPAL SINGH ARORA & ANR.House No. 3041, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh 160 021U.T2. Tirath Pal Singh,House No. 3041, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh 160 021UT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAA...
Case Number: 1164
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:879 of 2016Date of Institution:02.12.2016Date of Decision:23.05.2017Sh. B.S.Kapur s/o Late H.S.Kapur r/o D-6/8, Vasant Vihar (GF), New Delhi – 110057.Smt. Kulvinder Kapur w/o Sh. B.S.Kapur r/o D...
Case Number: 879
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
At the time of hearing of this Execution Application bearing No.16 of 2017, it was brought to our notice that by filing Miscellaneous Application bearing no.495 of 2017, the Judgment Debtors, in terms of order dated 30.03.2017 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paramjit Batta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Against order under execution, the Judgment Debtors have gone in First Appeal bearing No.524 of 2017 and vide order dated 07.04.2017, operation of the order under execution was stayed subject to making deposit of the entire principal amount within four weeks with this Commis...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for both the parties that operation of the judgment under execution has been stayed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 16.05.2017. In view of above, this execution application stands disposed of giving lib...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jitender Malik,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
In this complaint, following relief has been sought by the complainant:-“i. Direct the respondents to handover the possession of Unit No.CPM-12-A2-F0112 at Central Plaza, Mohali Hills, Sector 105, Mohali to the complainant forthwith; andii. direct the Respondents to pa...
Case Number: 772
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.140 of 2016Date of Institution18.11.2016Date of Decision12.05.2017Sh. Ajit Singh Ubhi son of S. Sarwan Singh, resident of House No.911, Phase 3 B 2 Mohali.….… Decree Ho...
Case Number: 140
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.141 of 2016Date of Institution18.11.2016Date of Decision12.05.2017Sh. Ajit Singh Ubhi son of S. Sarwan Singh, resident of House No.911, Phase 3 B 2 Mohali.….… Decree Ho...
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.142 of 2016Date of Institution18.11.2016Date of Decision12.05.2017Surinder Kaur W/o Sh. Ajit Singh Ubhi son of S. Sarwan Singh, resident of House No.911, Phase 3 B 2 Mohali.Gurpreet ...
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.