company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Chand Babu

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/376/2022( Date of Filing : 21 Nov 2022 )InEx./1/2002 DCC II1. Chand BabuS/o Mohd. Pyare R/o 228/128 Raja Bazar Chawk Lucknow...........

Case Number: 376

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt Sushila Gupta V/S New Okhla Industrial Development Authority

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ashok Shukla

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/2077( Date of Filing : 13 Oct 2010 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. New Okhla Industrial Development A...

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 13-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2022

NCDRC

KARAN CHRUNGU V/S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 602 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 21/07/2020 in Complaint No. 996/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PUDA BHAWAN , SECTOR 62, SAHIB...

Case Number: 602

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Greater Noida Industrial DEvelopment Authority V/S Ms. Rajyasri Roy Chowdhury

Development Authority   Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi

Respondant Advocate Rajesh Chadha

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/369/2019( Date of Filing : 11 Dec 2019 )1. Ms. Rajyasri Roy ChowdhuryCare of Shri Tanmoy Chakravorty R/O P-241 Lake Road Gound Floor Kolkatta 7...

Case Number: 369

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2022

NCDRC

TRIPTA SACHDEV V/S HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA BHARDWAJ & MR. ISHWAR SINGH SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 108 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 02/12/2021 in Appeal No. 847/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY............

Case Number: 108

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2022

|

Date of Upload: 14-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Usha Goel V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj & Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate No. Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/767( Date of Filing : 24 Mar 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/02/2003 in Case No. C/76/2000 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Autho...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2003

|

Date of Upload: 16-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Meerut Development Authority V/S Anwar Hussain Quraishi

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V S Bisaria

Respondant Advocate Om Prakash Panday

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/2012/244( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Anwar Hussain Quraishi225 Madh...

Case Number: 2012

|

Date of Filing: 01-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Dheeraj Madan

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shuchita Singh

Respondant Advocate No Advocate (OP)

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Review Application No. RA/1/2022( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/258/20191. Dheeraj MadanR/o 3 Hari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delhi 1...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Preeti Nijhawan

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Suchita Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Review Application No. RA/4/2022( Date of Filing : 13 Jan 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/259/20191. Preeti NijhawanR/O 3 Haari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delh...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-11-2022

NCDRC

SMRITI RAZDAN & 2 ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL

Respondant Advocate MR. NARINDER SAFAYA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2130 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 07/08/2018 in Complaint No. 100/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN, INA MARKET NEW DELHI 110023........

Case Number: 2130

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.