company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Moradabad Development Authority V/S Anju Varshney

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.P. Pandey And Devendra Varshney

Respondant Advocate Abhishek Misra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/133/2022( Date of Filing : 28 Feb 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/12/2021 in Case No. C/2021/139 of District Shambhal)1. Moradabad Development...

Case Number: 181

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2022

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2023

West Bengal

Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S Jayanta Banerjee

Development Authority  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/77/2015( Date of Filing : 31 Dec 2015 )InComplaint Case No. CC/14/6771. Jayanta Banerjee14/F, Nimu Goswami Lane, ...

Case Number: 77

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Seema Chaudhary V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ramraj, Piyush Mani Tripathi

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma, Nand Kishor

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/177/2022( Date of Filing : 14 Mar 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/01/2022 in Case No. C/2018/122 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Auth...

Case Number: 177

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2022

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2023

Uttar Pradesh

meerut Development Authority V/S Smt. Seema Chaudhari

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/610/2022( Date of Filing : 05 Jul 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/01/2022 in Case No. C/2018/122 of District Meerut)1. Smt. Seema ChaudhariW/o...

Case Number: 610

|

Date of Filing: 05-07-2022

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2023

NCDRC

GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) V/S RAJNI SIHAG & ANR.

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUSHA NAGARAJAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2320 OF 20171. RAJNI SIHAG & ANR.D/O MOHINDER SINGH R/O 951 A, SECTOR-7-B,CHANDIGARH2. MS RINAD/O MOHINDER SINGH R/O 951 A, SECTOR7-B,CHANDIGARH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOP...

Case Number: 2320

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Shivalik Arora

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Gupta

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.Execution Application No.196 of 2021InConsumer Complaint No.250 of 2019 Date of institution: 18.10.2021Date of Decision : 06.01.2023Shivalik Arora aged 32 years S/o Sh. Ravi Arora R/o H.No.A-93, Ranjit Avenue, Amrit...

Case Number: 196

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-01-2023

Punjab

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Gurcharan Kaur

Development Authority  

Court Name: Rupnagar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajiv Sharma Ghanauli, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTT. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, ROPAR Consumer Complaint No. :87 of 03.02.2021 Date of decision :16.12.2022Gurcharan Kaur wife of Didar Singh resident of VPO Ghanauli, Tehsil & District Rupnagar ......Complainant VersusGreater Mohali Area Developm...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Krishna Bajpai V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi

Respondant Advocate A K Rai

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/272( Date of Filing : 12 Feb 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kanpur Development Authoritya.........

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2001

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2022

Haryana

Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority & Others V/S Surinder Singh Puri

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate A K Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/216/2021( Date of Filing : 09 Apr 2021 )1. Surinder Singh Puri H. No. 169, Sec-17, FBD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority & OthersSec-12, FBD............Opp....

Case Number: 216

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-01-2023

Orissa

Akshaya Kumar Routray V/S The Cuttack Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. D. Mohapatra & Assoc.

Respondant Advocate Mr. A.K. Samal

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKFirst Appeal No. A/450/2009( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2009 in Case No. CD/342/2008 of District Cuttak)1. The Cuttack Development AuthorityRepresented through its Secretary, Aru...

Case Number: 450

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-01-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.