company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S DHARAMPAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K & R LEGAL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 677 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/07/2013 in Complaint No. 55/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DHARAMPALS/O. SHRI RAGHBIR SINGH, R/O. H NO. 992, SECTOR-23, SONEPATHARYANA ...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 677

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2022

NCDRC

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW PRAYAGRAJ DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) V/S FARHAT SIDDIQUI

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M. TAIYAB KHAN

Respondant Advocate MR. VIBHAV MISHRA & EKANSH BANSAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 16/10/2019 in Appeal No. 7024/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. FARHAT SIDDIQUI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW PRA...

Case Number: 1134

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2022

Chandigarh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Subedar Major Jaswant Singh

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:RBT CC/1130/2019Date of Institution:23/12/2019Date of Decision:04/11/2022Subedar Major Jaswant Singh, veteran, H.No.2525/B, Sector 47C, Chandigarh (UT) Pin 160047… ComplainantV E R S U ...

Case Number: 1130

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2022

Punjab

Estate Officer,Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (PUDA) V/S Baljinder Singh Sekhon

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gurdaspur

Appelant Advocate Sh.Vinod Harchand Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh.Manjiner Pal Singh Lehal, Adv.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GURDASPURDISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX , B BLOCK ,2nd Floor Room No. 328 Complaint Case No. CC/225/2021( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2021 )1. Baljinder Singh Sekhons/o Baaz Singh R/o H.No.186 Improvement Trust colony Scheme No.5 Jail...

Case Number: 225

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ashok Kumar jain V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi

Respondant Advocate Vineet Sahari Bisaria

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/92/2019( Date of Filing : 14 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2019 in Case No. C/225/2011 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development...

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Faiyaz Ahmad

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rohit Jaiswal & Mohit Gupta & Adarsh Pratap Singh

Respondant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/58/2021( Date of Filing : 28 Jan 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/03/2020 in Case No. C/2012/441 of District Lucknow-I)1. Faiyaz AhmadS/O Shri ...

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Shilpa Gupta V/S Agra Development Authority

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar & Om Prakash Pandey

Respondant Advocate V.K. Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/970( Date of Filing : 03 Jun 2010 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development Authoritya...........

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-11-2022

Haryana

USHA DEVI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PARVEEN MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA Panchkula Date of Instituion:05.09.2022 Date of final hearing:28.10.2022 Date of pronouncement:13.01.2023 APPEAL No.442 of 2022IN THE MATTER OF:1. Haryana Urban Development Authority (Now H.S.V.P), through its Chief Administr...

Case Number: 442

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2023

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BALDEV SHARMA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/501/2012( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2012 )1. BALDEV SHARMA H NO. 2663 GF SECTOR-3 HOUSING BOARD COLONY FARIDABAD 121004.............

Case Number: 501

|

Date of Filing: 25-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Surendra Kaur V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate No. Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/350( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/01/2003 in Case No. C/432/2002 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Auth...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2003

|

Date of Upload: 14-10-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.