company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Suman Kumari Sangwan

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rishi P. Deswal

Respondant Advocate Sh. M.K. Munjal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/461( Date of Filing : 16 Oct 2020 )1. Suman Kumari SangwanW/o Sh. Sudhir Sangwan R/o VPO Nuran Khera, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban ...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2023

Haryana

The Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Vijay Pal

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Lajpat Rai Chuchra

Respondant Advocate Rishi Pal Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 731 of 2019 Date of instt.30.10.2019 Date of Decision:06.03.2023Vijay Pal son of Shri Kalu Ram age 82 years, resident of house no.1034, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal. …….Complainan...

Case Number: 731

|

Date of Filing: 30-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Mohinder Singh Sachdeva

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Jagtar Singh Dhaliwal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/23/21( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/20/821. Mohinder Singh SachdevaS/o Basant Singh Sachdeva R/o House No. 35/5, Ashok Nagar, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi...........Appellant...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Shanti Devi V/S Gaziabad Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar Umesh Chandra

Respondant Advocate A K Sinha

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/683( Date of Filing : 04 May 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gaziabad Development Authoritya.......

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Savita Garg

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/35( Date of Filing : 02 Mar 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/22/181. Savita GargW/o Mohinder Kumar R/o House no. 22-B Hira Nagar Tehsil and District Patiala...........Appellant(s)Ver...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Taran Kumar

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/36( Date of Filing : 02 Mar 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/21/161. Taran KumarS/o Laxmi narain R/o Bharat Cinema Street Ward No. 3 Budhlada.MansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Suresh Kumar

Development Authority   Suresh  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/38( Date of Filing : 02 Mar 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/21/221. Suresh KumarS/o Bharat Singh R/o House No. 5022, Sector-11, Tehsil and Dist. Jind...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Asha Kaul V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate Istekhar Hasan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/1464( Date of Filing : 04 Aug 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Meerut Development Authoritya........

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2023

Chandigarh

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Jagvir Singh Kang

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arjun Sharma & Ramandeep Kaleka Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Addl. Bench]Consumer Complaint No.:CC/46/2022Date of Institution:24/05/2022Date of Decision:28/02/2023Jagvir Singh Kang son of Sh. Inderjit Singh, Resident of V.P.O. Kotla Shamsher Ludhiana, Punjab, presently residing ...

Case Number: 46

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Praveen Kumar Arora V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar

Respondant Advocate R.K. Mishra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/92/2022( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/641/20191. Kanpur Development Authoritya...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.