company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Azad Singh Chopra

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Amit Gautam

Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/21/349( Date of Filing : 21 Jun 2021 )1. Azad Singh ChopraS/o Sh. Daryao Singh, R/o 517, Golf Course Road, Sector-43, Gurugram- Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Developmen...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2021

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Chand Garg V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority   Suresh  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate R.D. Kranti

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1199/2019( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/09/2019 in Case No. C/148/2015 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Aut...

Case Number: 1199

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2023

Karnataka

Mysuru Urban Development Authority V/S B.Hutchaiah

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate T.N.Raghupathy

Respondant Advocate

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/1301/2019( Date of Filing : 16 Sep 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/08/2019 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/89/2017 of District Mysore)1. B.HutchaiahS/o P.Basavegowda, Aged abo...

Case Number: 1301

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2023

Chandigarh

The Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Development Authority V/S Rishi Raj

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:307 of 2021Date of Institution:19.05.2021Date of Decision:15.03.2023Rishi Raj s/o Late Sh.Hem Raj, R/o House No.1056, Sector 18-C, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1] The Chief Administr...

Case Number: 307

|

Date of Filing: 19-05-2021

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Garima Rastogi

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Singla

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/46( Date of Filing : 14 Mar 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/23/121. Garima RastogiW/o Manu Rastogi R/o 98 FF, State Bank Nagar, Pachim Vihar, New Delhi, Now R/o 119 GF, State Bank nagar Pa...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2023

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S BANKEY BIHARI SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. THE LAW CARE

Respondant Advocate MS. AAKANKSHA KAUL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1381 OF 20181. BANKEY BIHARI SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETYR/o 104, Sunehra Bagh Appartment Sector-13, RohiniNew Delhi - 1100852. .............Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.(Through Vice...

Case Number: 1381

|

Date of Filing: 04-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Bareilly Development Authority V/S Ashok Kumar Gupta

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Tandon

Respondant Advocate V P Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2006/1327( Date of Filing : 30 May 2006 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Ashok Kumar Guptaa...........Appel...

Case Number: 2006

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2006

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Smt Arpana Srivastav V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Balwant Rai

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/60/2023( Date of Filing : 31 Jan 2023 )InFirst Appeal No. A/2006/13441. Gorakhpur Development AuthorityGorakhpur...........Appellant...

Case Number: 60

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2023

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Sandeep Kumar Gupta

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sh. Randeep Sharma

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/43( Date of Filing : 10 Mar 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/23/101. Sandeep Kumar GuptaS/o Amar Nath Gupta R/o 243, GT Road, 5th Floor, 5C liluah, Howarh, Now R/o 74B A.J.C Bose Road, 4th ...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 10-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Satish Garg

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Singla

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/44( Date of Filing : 10 Mar 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/23/91. Satish GargS/o Sham Lal Garg R/o house no. 71, Bhairav Dutta Lane, Nandi Bagan Salkia Howarh, Now R/o 289, GT Road, Vishn...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 10-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.