company-name-logo

Builder

Latest Judgments

Total 956 Consumer Court Cases Against Builder.

Maharashtra

DINESH K GALA , BUILDER V/S DATTARAM S PAWASKAR

Builder  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mrs. Gargi R. Bhatkar/Mr. Dinesh P. Sarvagod

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/261. DATTARAM S PAWASKARR/O. SHRI. AMBIKA DARSHAN CO. OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED) C.T.S. NO. 231 AND 232 AT VILLAGE KIROL, TALUKA KURLA, NEAR THAKUR INDUSTRIES, K...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DESHMUKH BUILDER PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S GOPAL HIRALAL RAJBHOJ & 3 ORS.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SURESHCHANDRA N. CHATAULE

Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND GUPTA, MR. ASHU GUPTA & MR. NATASHA NAUTIYAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4322 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 154/2012 & 322/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. GOPAL HIRALAL RAJBHOJ & 3 ORS.F-2/304, Deshmukh Homes, Aboli Co-Op Hsg,Scty Ltd. ...

Case Number: 4322

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2013

NCDRC

ANUJA GOYAL V/S GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KARUNESH TANDON

Respondant Advocate M/S. MISHRA ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4553 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1236/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.GTM House, G-5, Pushkar Encalve, Outer Ring Road, Paschim Vih...

Case Number: 4553

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2013

NCDRC

M .C. GOEL V/S GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KARUNESH TANDON

Respondant Advocate M/S. MISHRA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1237/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.GTM House, G-5 Pushkar Encalve, Outer Ring Road, Paschim Viha...

Case Number: 4554

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2013

Karnataka

M/s Sequiera Star Home Builder V/S Mr. Brayan J. Vaz

Builder  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/16/2012( Date of Filing : 27 Dec 2011 )1. Mr. Brayan J. VazMangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Sequiera Star Home BuilderMangalore............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: For...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-12-2018

NCDRC

M/S. DEVYOG BUILDER PVT. LTD. 2 ORS. V/S M/S. OM POONAM ENCLAVE CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

Builder   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAMESH R. SHINDE, Advocate

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 47 OF 20121. M/S. OM POONAM ENCLAVE CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.The Mr. Javed Abdul Wadood Sayyed., Om Poonam Enclave Co-Op, Housing Society Ltd.New Old Golden Nest, Mira-Bhayander.,Road, Mira-Road (east), ...

Case Number: 47

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2013

Maharashtra

SHRI. VINAYAK LAXMANRAO USKELWAR (OWNER, BUILDER & DEVELOPERS) V/S SMT. RANJANA SURESH FEDDEWAR

Builder  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. BHOSKAR

Respondant Advocate Adv. Balpande

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING3RD FLOOR, CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001 . P.H.NO. 0712-2546884Execution Application No. EA/12/21. SMT. RANJANA SURESH FEDDEWARHUDAKESHWAR NAKA, NAGPUR ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI. VINAY...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S. D.S. BUILDER V/S PALM BREEZE C.H.S. LTD,

Builder  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate DIPTI GANDHI

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MUKESH KUMAR JAIN V/S GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.

Builder  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KARUNESH TANDON

Respondant Advocate DR. H.B. MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1319 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/03/2012 in Appeal No. 4/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. GTM BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.GTM House,G-5 Pushkar Enclave, Outer Ring Road,Paschim ViharNew De...

Case Number: 1319

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2013

Maharashtra

R.B. CONSTRUCTIONS BUILDER & DEVELOPERS V/S NITA CHANDRAKANT MATKAR

Builder  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ANITA MARATHE, ASHUTOSH MARATHE, SUBODH GOKHALE

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Builder in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Builder ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Builder under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.