
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate B.J. Mahesh
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/852/2010 Smt. Nandini Shankar, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Bharti Airtel Ltd., ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Compl...
Case Number: 852
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624 No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052. consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/887 M/s Sunvik Steels Pvt Ltd, Represented By Its Managing Director ...........Appel...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vishal Madan
Respondant Advocate Sumeet Goel
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 163 of 2010 1. Jagjit Singhson of Late Sh. Mohinder Singh R/o House No 2076 Victoria Enclave SEctor-50/C Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bha...
Case Number: 163
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sanjay Sinha
Complaint Case No. 379/20061. Ajay Kumar J. PanickerMumbai...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.Mumbai............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERPER SHRI. S.B.DHUMAL - HON’...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Lega sol
Respondant Advocate
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. cc/1429/2010 Ingwenya mineral tech pvt ltd ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Bharti airtel limited The general manager ............
Case Number: 1429
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kulbansh Singh
Respondant Advocate -
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 42 of 2009 1. Arun Kumar Kaushal, Assistant General Manager,State Bank of India, Sector-17, , Chandigarh, R/o Flat No. 104, GHS-32, Sec...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 47 of 2010 1. Ashok KUmarchd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.chd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Khammam
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT KHAMMAMVaradaiah Nagar, Opp CSI Churchconsumer case(CC) No. CC/09/23 Sri. Kasthala Durga Rao,Aswapuram 507 116 ...........Appellant(s)Vs.M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd.,New Delhi 110 030 ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s)/Appellan...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-1970
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 27 of 2010 1. Amrik Singhson of Sh. Jaswant Singh R/o House no. 2039 Sector-20/C Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel MobilesCo...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/1640/2009 G.Priyadarshini ...........Appellant(s)Vs.M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd., ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Compl...
Case Number: 1640
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.