
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJAY SINHA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/582(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/06/2010 in Case No. 175/09 of District Additional DCF, Thane)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD7 TH FLOOR BUILDING NO 7 INTERFACE LINK ROAD MALAD WEST MUMB...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJAY SINHA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3061. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD 7 TH FLOOR BUILDING NO 7 INTERFACE LINK ROAD MALAD WEST MUMBAI 400064MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ATUL AGARWAL 203/...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 30 of 2012 1. Ashok KumarChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 24 Feb 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH Misc. Appli...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 23 of 2011 1. Mrs. Tarun GuptaW/o Sh. Mahesh KUmar Gupta R/o HOuse No. 3356 SEctor-27/D Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.Plot No. 21 Rajiv Gandhi IT Park Chandigarh-160101, 2nd Address: Bharti A...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 50 of 2011 1. Ashok KumarR/o # 1511, Sector 7/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.C-25, Industrial Area, Phase II, Mohali, through its General Manager.2. The Radius, SCO 51-52, Sector 8/C, ...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)8TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BWSSB BUILDING, BANGALORE-5600 09.Complaint Case No. CC/11/11321. Prassana V NadgirFlat NoF1 Yoga Apartment,No,47 EAT Street Basavanagudi,Nr Netkallappa circle,Bangalore-560004 BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERCO...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 145 of 2011 1. Ashok KumarChd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.Chd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 11 Jan 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DI...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate V.A.Ahuja
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1181. Shri Santhosh Ashok AhujaPatil Chowk,Dound Dist PunePuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharti Airtel Comp LtdVega Center A,Building,Shankar shet Road Swarget ,Pune-37PuneMaha............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/11/20931. V.V. Kadam Owner KnowledgeWorkz Consulting68/B, 21st Cross, 2nd Block, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560010. ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. cc/2009/4471. R.R.ShendeLaw College Road pune...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharti Airtel Shankarshet Road Pune............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri. S. K. Kapase MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERद्वारा-श्रीमती �...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.