
Address: Bharti Telemedia Limited Plot No 16,Udhyog Vihar, Phase IV, Airtel Center Gurgaon 122015 Haryana, India.
Email ID: customercare@airtel.com
Phone No: 121
Website : https://www.airtel.in/
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/763( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2013 )1. Rup Dipak MallickSri Kamakshya Apartment, 509, Jodhpur Park, Kolkata-700068.......
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2023
Court Name: Jalgaon
Appelant Advocate Adv.Gujrathi
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/12111. Rajendra Baburao ShindechopadaMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharati Airtel Pvt. LtdPuneMaharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. M.S.Sonawane PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. C.M. Yeshirao Member PRESENT: ORDERग्राहक �...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/13/25821. ALIF GRANITES PVT LTD.A Company Registered Under the Companies Act 1956 having its registered Office a...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH CHAHAR
Respondant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI & MS. SHWETA KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 324 OF 2013 IN RP/190/20121. RAMESH KUMAR ROHILLA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE M...
Case Number: 324
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B.K. MAHIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/12/2012 in Appeal No. 878/2012 of the State Commission Kerala)1. HARISS/O A.K ABDUL KHADER, PROPRIETOR , AIM DISTRIBUTORS, CPXV/281 G. CHAMABALAM ROAD, BERKA P.O...
Case Number: 2278
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2785 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/04/2013 in Appeal No. 12/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/4780/2013,IA/4781/20131. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.AIRTEL CENTRE GURGAON, UDYOG VIHAR , PHASE-IVGUR...
Case Number: 2785
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2013
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/188/2013( Date of Filing : 06 Jul 2013 )1. Rangappa BhoviS.o.Sanna Rangappa Bhovi, Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Bharath AirtelBangalore............Opp...
Case Number: 188
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/323(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/02/2012 in Case No. 275/2009 of District Pune)1. MR PRADEEP R TANNUPROP P R ENTERPRISES SHOP NO 3 SHWETA APARTMENT LOWEINDIRANAGAR BIBVEWADI ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KG GOPALAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2981 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 122/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.PRESENTLY ADD: AIRTEL CENTRE,, 2ND FLOOR, PLOT NO-16, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV, GU...
Case Number: 2981
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KG GOPALAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2982 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 123/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.PRESENTLY AT: AIRTEL CENTRE, 2ND FLOOR PLOT NO 16, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV, GURGA...
Case Number: 2982
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.