Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/232/2017

C.Saleem - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India & anr - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person-Applt.,

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                  BEFORE     Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                        Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                        Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

 

FA. No. 232/2017

(Against the order in C.C. No.64/2012, dated 11.3.2014, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Krishnagiri]

 

                                                  DATED THIS THE 31^st  DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

S.Saleem,

Belrampatti village,

Thirumalvadi post,

Palacode taluk,

Dharmapuri – 636 808                             ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                               Vs

1. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

A.Mallapuram branch,

Palacode Taluk,

Dharmapuri District

 

2. Regional Manager,

State Bank of India,

No.127, Gandhi Road,

Vellore – 632 004                              ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant             :  M/s P. Arumugavel

Counsel for the Respondents/opposite parties   : M/s K.Kumaran

 

    This appeal coming on before us today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court :-

    

                                                                   Docket order

      No representation for appellant. Respondents 1 and 2 present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.    

 

    Sd/-                                                Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                   JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT