Learned counsel for the petitioner-IRFC Ltd. submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to comply with the order passed by the concerned District Forum in these cases directing the petitioner to pay interest @ 15% on the bond redemption amount with effect from the date of maturity till the date of payment of the redemption value but in the order passed by the State Commission some inadvertent error has appeared because while dismissing the appeal against the order of the District Forum the State Commission has made certain observations in regard to the payment of the redemption amount as well, which stood already paid to the complainants/respondents. 

We are in agreement with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner-IRFC Ltd. because the petitioner, having already paid the amount of redemption value of the bond, cannot be called upon to pay the said amount again and at best they could have been directed to pay interest for the delay in making the payment.  The respondents/complainants were satisfied with the order passed by the District Forum and had not challenged the same and it was only the petitioner-IRFC Ltd.  who has filed the appeal against the said order.

          In the circumstances, the revision petitions are disposed of with the observations that the appeals filed by the petitioner-IRFC Ltd. before the State Commissions will be deemed to have been dismissed, thereby maintaining the order passed by the District Forum in its entirety.