Kerala

StateCommission

A/12/250

MANAPPURAM BENEFIT FUND - Complainant(s)

Versus

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPNAY - Opp.Party(s)

J.S.ASOK KUMAR

04 Apr 2012

ORDER

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Vazhuthacaud,Thiruvananthapuram
 
First Appeal No. A/12/250
(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/11/2011 in Case No. CC/12/551 of District Trissur)
 
1. MANAPPURAM BENEFIT FUND
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPNAY
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

AKERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL NOS 250/12 & 251/12

COMMON JUDGMENT DTD.4.4.12

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                --  PRESIDENT

 

APPEAL NO.250/12

 

M/s Manappuram Finance Ltd.

Manappuram House,

Valappad P.O, Thrissur,                                     --  APPELLANT

Reptd. by Jayaraj N.R. Manager-Legal,

Thiruvananthapuram.

  (By Adv.J.S.Asok kumar)

 

                   Vs.

 

Divisional Manager,

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.                      --  RESPONDENT

1st Floor, Maheswary Building,

 M..G.Road, Thrissur.

                                     

APPEAL NO.251/12

 

M/s Manappuram Finance Ltd.

Manappuram House,

Valappad P.O, Thrissur,                                     --  APPELLANT

Reptd. by Jayaraj N.R. Manager-Legal,

Thiruvananthapuram.

  (By Adv.J.S.Asok kumar)

 

                   Vs.

 

Divisional Manager,

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.                      --  RESPONDENT

1st Floor, Maheswary Building,

 M..G.Road, Thrissur.

 

 

COMMON JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT

 

          The appellant in both the matters is the complainant/financiers in CC.551/11 and CC 552/11 in the file of CDRF, Thrissur. The complainant has sought for the assured sum  vide the fidelity guarantee policy with the opposite party/Insurance Company with respect to the loss occasioned due to  infidelity on the part of the employees  of the firm.  The complaints were dismissed by the firm on the ground that the complainant is a commercial enterprise.

 

          2. We find that the order of the Forum is clearly  erroneous as the question of law on the point is settled vide a number of decisions eg; M/s Horsolia Motors vs. M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd; 2005 CPJ (I)   (NC)  27 etc.   As noted in the above decision, the person who takes insurance policy to cover the envisaged risk does not take the policy for commercial purpose.    Policy is only for indemnification and actual loss.  It is not intended to generate profit.  In the circumstances, the orders of the Forum in both the matters are set aside.  The Forum is directed to issue notice to the opposite parties, consider the complaint and dispose of the same on merits.  The matter stands posted before the Forum on 29.5.2012.

Office will forward a copy of this order to the Forum.

 

JUSTICE  K.R.UDAYABHANU --  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.