Heard the Counsel for the petitioner. There are concurrent findings of two foras below. It has been found that the original licence on the basis of which the petitioner got his licence renewed from Bilaspur Authority was a fake licence. Alternatively, it has been held that licence in the name of the petitioner could not have been issued to him as he was 16 years old. Taking all these factors into consideration, the fora below have held that the complainant is not entitled to compensation for the loss claimed by the complainant with reference to the vehicle which met with an accident. The case is completely covered by judgment of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd., vs Laximnarain Dhut – III (2007) 700 SCC. In view of this we do not find that any case is made out for interference in the impugned order in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 21 (b) of the C P Act, 1986, as we do not find any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error in the order of the State Commission. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed, with no order as to cost.