PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK

            Counsel for the petitioners present.  This is an indisputable fact that the Arbitrator has already passed Award, which has attained finality. This is not the case where Arbitration Clause is there or Arbitration proceedings are pending.   Consequently, we are bound by that judgment and these revision petitions arise out of same cause of action, hence these petitions are not maintainable.  It is well settled that Judgment passed by the Civil Court binds the consumer Foras. A divergent and contradictory Judgment should not and cannot be passed.

The Foras below have already decided that the petitioners are not the Consumers and without going into that question all the four revision petitions are hereby dismissed.