Challenge in this revision petition is to the order dated 27.08.2010 passed by the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad (‘State Commission’ for short) by which the State Commission dismissed the appeal of the OPs, petitioners herein, against the order dated 21.03.2007 passed by the District Forum accepting the complaint of the complainants. The District Forum by its order had given the following directions while partly allowing the complaint:-

 

 

2.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. The broad facts of the case are not under dispute. Admittedly, the petitioners denied boarding passes to the complainants/respondents herein in respect of their confirmed tickets. After considering the evidence adduced, both the fora below by their concurrent finding of facts have partly accepted the complaint by holding the petitioner Company guilty of deficiency in its service. No fault could be found with this concurrent finding of facts of the fora below based on evidence. There being no other legal issues involved, we do not find any good reason which would justify our interference with the impugned order. The revision petition, therefore, is liable for dismissal and the same is dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.