Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/457/2012

Aashish Gupta - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDFC Bank Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Hitender Kansal, Chetan Gupta, Adv.

19 Sep 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 457 of 2012
1. Aashish GuptaS/o Sh. Surinder Kumar Gupta, r/o H.No. 3387, Sector 19D, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. HDFC Bank Ltd.through Mr. Aditya Puri, CMD, New Building, A Wing, 2nd Floor, 26-A, Narayan Properties, Chandi Wali, Farm Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 4000722. Mr. Adiyta PuriCMD, HDFC Bank Ltd., New Building, A wing, 2nd Floor, 26-A, Narayan Properties, Chandi Wali, Farm Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 4000723. Mr. Govind Pandey, Regional Head, HDFC Bank Ltd.Plot No. 28, Phase 0I, Industrial Area, Chandigarh4. Mr. Dashmeet SinghCluster Head, HDFC Bank, Ltd., Plot No. 28, Phase -I, Industrial Area, Chandigarh5. Mediassist India TPA(P) Ltd,SCO 62, 2nd Floor, Phase 7, Mohali, through its Manager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Mr. Hitender Kansal, Chetan Gupta, Adv., Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 19 Sep 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.457 of 2012

 

 

Aashish Gupta                 Vs.              HDFC Bank Ltd. & ors.

 

 

PRESENT:

 

Complainant in person.

 

Dated the 19th day of September, 2012

 

ORDER

 

            The complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

 

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, I reserve my right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect.”

 

 

            In view of the statement made by the complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

           

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER