Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/352/2016

J.Balaji - Complainant(s)

Versus

Citi Bank NA - Opp.Party(s)

K.Sivasubramanian, L.Leelaraman

12 Sep 2019

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 19.10.2016                                                                          Date of Order  : 12.09.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                      : PRESIDENT

TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.   :  MEMBER

 

C.C. No.352/2016

DATED THIS THURSDAY THE 12^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019

1. J. Balaji,

S/o. Mr. G.R. Jayachandran,

New No.9, Old No.4,

Professor Subramaniam Street,

Kilpauk,

Chennai – 600 010.

 

2. B. Vanitha,

W/o. Mr. J. Balaji,

New No.9, Old No.4,

Professor Subramaniam Street,

Kilpauk,

Chennai – 600 010.                                                    .. Complainants.

..Versus..

 

1. Citibank NA,

B-7, 8^th Floor Nirlon,

Knowledge Park,

Goregaon East,

Mumbai – 400 063.

 

2. Citibank NA,

No.2, Club House Road,

Chennai – 600 002.                                                .. Opposite parties.

 

 Counsel for the complainants     :  M/s. K. Sivasubramanian &

                                                         another

Counsel for the opposite parties :  M/s. King Stubb & Kaisiva

                                                         & another

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainants against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to repay the excess interest of Rs.5,78,791/-  charged in the Loan Accounts of the complainants with subsequent interest thereon at 12% p.a. from 01.03.2013 to 18.10.2016 in all a sum of Rs.8,93,119/- with future interest on Rs.5,78,791/- from 19.10.2016 upto the date of full payment and to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and deficiency in service with cost of the proceedings.

Proof Affidavit of the complainants not filed for a long time to prove the allegations raised in the complaint.  The complainants and Counsel absent for a long time.   Hence, this case is dismissed for default.

Dated this Thursday the 12^th day of September 2019.

 

 

MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT