Heard counsel for the petitioner.  The revision has been filed with delay of 119 days and the only reason given for delay in filing the revision is found in para 3 of the condonation application wherein it is stated that after handing over records to the counsel at Delhi, it took some time in getting the revision petition filed since the order of the District Forum was in Kannada which was got translated through a local counsel at Bangalore.  It is cannot be treated as sufficient ground to condone the enormous delay of 119 days.  The application for condonation of delay is, therefore, dismissed.

          Even on merits, we do not find that any case has been made out by the petitioner/complainant in appeal and the appeal was rightly dismissed by the State Commission.  The State Commission had very rightly observed that the allegations of the complainant in the said vehicle he kept 10 quintals of areca nut, 30 tholas of gold appears to be imaginary and unbelievable.  We fully endorse the findings of the State Commission.

In view of this, we do not find any merit in this revision to interfere in the impugned order of the State Commission.  The revision is dismissed both on the ground of condonation of delay as also on merits, with no order as to cost.