BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.178 OF 2021

AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.530/2019,

DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY

Between:

1. Meeta Jain, W/o.Jitendra Jain,

    Aged about 51 years, represented by

    Jitendra Jain

2. Jitendra Jain, S/o.Late Sh Mangal Chand

    Jain, aged about 54 years,

Both past resident of, E7/1, Research Centre Imarat,

RCI Road, P.O.Vignyana Kancha, and Rangareddy

District 500069,

Residence wef 18 Jan 2021 is Flat No.H28,

1302,  Flat No.H28, 1302, AWHO,

Sandeep Vihar-Hoskote Rd,

Kannamangala, Whitefield Bengaluru,

Karnataka 560115.

                                        .……Appellant/Complainant

And

1. Bharti Airtel Limited (A Bharti

    Enterprise) Bharti Crescent,

    1 Nelson Mandela Road,

    Vasant Kunj, Phase II,

    New Delhi – 110 070

    compliance.officer@bharti.in

    ……Represented by its Manager

2. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar

    Nigam Limited, Bharat Sanchar Bhawan,

    Harish Chandra Mathur Lane,

    Janpath New Delhi  110001

    Email hcpant@BSNL.Co.In, …..Represented

    by its Manager.

3. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority

    Of India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan

    (next to Zakir Hussain College)

    Jawaharlal Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road),

    New Delhi: 110 002

    Email ID: ap@trai.gov.in

    ………Represented by its Manager

   …..Respondents/Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant: Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)

Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties: M/s. Gopi Rajesh &

Associates – R1

Sri Prabhakar Reddy-R2

Sri Sudhakar Rao

Kulkarni – R3                                               

QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Order :

1.      This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.530/2019 dated 08.02.2021 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

3.       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.