BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.183 OF 2021

 (against the orders in CC.No.92 /2020 on the file of the District Commission- Ranga Reddy

Between:

1. Jitendra Jain

    S/o. Late Sh Mangal Chand Jain,

2. Meeta Jain

    W/o. Jitendra Jain,

    Both resident of

    E7/1, RCI Residential Colony,

    Research Centre Imarat,

    RCI Road, Shamshabad,

    Rangareddy District P.O.,

Vignyana Kancha, Hyderabad – 500069,

… Appellants /Complainant

And

     1. Bharti Airtel Limited

     (A Bharti Enterprise)

     Bharti Crescent, 1 Nelson Mandela Road,

     Vasant Kunj, Phase –II, New Delhi-110070.

     Represented by its manager

     2. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

     Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan

     (next to Zkir Hussain College)

     Jawaharlal Nehru Marg (old Minto Road)

     New Delhi:110002: E-mail ID: ap@trai.gov.in

     Represented by its manager

             .... Respondents/ Opposite parties

Counsel for the Complainant         : Sri Jitendra Jain(PIP)

Counsel for the Opposite Parties    : Sri Sudhakar Rao Kulkarni – R2

QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Oral Order:

1.    This is an appeal filed by the Appellant / Complainant under Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order of the District Forum, Ranga Reddy passed in C.C.No.92 of 2020 dated 08.02.2021.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021.  Thereafter, this Commission has

suo moto issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities.  In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals.  The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present.  Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeal is liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

3.       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.