Telangana

Hyderabad

CC/210/2018

B.Balraj - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. M/s Air India - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.G.V.S.Prasad Rao and Associates

13 Dec 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD
(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/210/2018
( Date of Filing : 15 May 2018 )
 
1. B.Balraj
S/o Late B.Narasappa, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, 8-4-371/A/26, Prabath Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad Telangana 500018.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. M/s Air India
Baggage Services, Chatrapthi Sivaji International Terminus, Mumbai 400099, Rep. by its Manager.
2. 2. M/s Air India
Baggage Services, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Shamshabad Hyderabad 500409, Rep. by its Manager.
3. 3. M/s. Air India
5-10-193, HACA Bhavan, Hill Fort Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500004, Rep. by its Manager.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.Ram Mohan MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. C.Lakshmi Prasanna MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 13 Dec 2019
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                                         Date of Filing:15-05-2018  

                                                                             Date of Order:13 -12-2019

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – I, HYDERABAD

 

P r e s e n t­

   HON’BLE  Sri  P.VIJENDER, B.Sc. L.L.B., PRESIDENT

HON’BLE Sri  K.RAM MOHAN, B.Sc. M.A L.L.B.,   MEMBER

HON’BLE Smt. CH. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, B.Sc. LLM. ,(PGD (ADR)  MEMBER

 

Friday, the  13th day of December, 2019

 

 

C.C.No.210 /2018

 

Between

 

 B Balraj

S/o  Late B.Narasappa,

Aged about  50 years,  Occ: Business,

8-4-371/A/26, Prabhat Nagar, Borabanda,

Hyderabad,Telangana – 500 018.                         ……Complainant

 

And

 

  1. M/s. Air India,

Baggage Services,

Chatrapathi Shivaji International Terminus,

Mumbai – 400 099, Rep.by its Manager.

 

  1. M/s. Air India,Baggage Services,

Rajiv Gandhi  International Air port

.         Shamshabad, Hyderabad – 500 409

          Rep,.by its Manager. 

 

  1. M/s. Air India,5-10-193, HACA Bhavan,

Hill Fort Road, Saifabad,

Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 004

Rep.by its Manager.                                      ….Opposite Parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                      :  Mr.G.V.S.Prasad

Counsel for the Opposite Parties              :  M/s.Uma Devi

 

O R D E R

 

(By Sri K.RAM MOHAN, B.Sc. M.A L.L.B.,  MEMBER on behalf of the bench)

 

  1. This complaint has  been filed under Section 12 of C.P. Act 1986 against  the opposite  parties  alleging that   misplacement of complainant’s baggage containing valuables by the  opposite parties  amounts to deficiency of service thereby praying  for seeking direction  by this Hon’ble Forum  to the opposite parties  to pay Rs.5,00,000/- compensation for loss of baggage  containing  valuables  worth of Rs.3,00,000/-;  and for the humiliation, mental agony, pain stress and trauma ;- Rs.25,000/- towards filing of the complaint; and other expenses incurred by the complainant  due to the negligence of the opposite  parties. 
  2. Succinctly  put, the facts material  to the case are that ;-  the complainant  booked the  tickets for travelling from Hyderabad to London (Heathrow)  Via New Delhi and return from  London (Heathrow)  to Hyderabad Via Mumbai.  Complainant flew to London (Heathrow)   from Hyderabad on 19-1-2018 for attending his daughters delivery.  While returning on 25-02-2018 he checked-in  two pieces of luggage at London (Heathrow).  On arrival at Mumbai he found that one of his  checked-in baggages weighing 7 Kgs was not arrived at Mumbai.  Consequently, he met the officials of  baggage service who  informed him  that the missed baggage would be boarded in the next  connecting flight to Hyderabad.  The complainant has also been informed  that he could proceed  to Hyderabad without waiting for his missed baggage.  When the complainant  reached Hyderabad, again he found that his missed baggage  did not arrive.  On contacting the  baggage service officials at Hyderabad, he was informed that  he could proceed and need not wait for his missed baggage by  assuring  that they would inform him as and when the missed baggage was received  by them.  Later, on 5-7-2018 a mail was sent to the complainant  by the opposite party informing that  the baggage in question if not arrived,  and the complainant  would be informed  that  he would be  paid Rs.11,180 towards compensation.  In response to the  above mail the complainant gave a reply letter Ex.A10 to it by informing the opposite party No.2 that his missed baggage consist of valuable goods and requested the opposite party to settle his claim as per the  Passenger Property Details (PPD) furnished by him in the questionnaire  format given by the  opposite party No.1 at Mumbai.  As the opposite party No.1 did not respond to the above  letter, this complaint has been preferred. 
  3. The version of  opposite parties No.1,2 and 3 is that the opposite party disputed the jurisdiction of this Forum for entertaining this complaint. 

             The opposite party admitted the fact  of purchase of tickets and travelling of complainant on the dates and from the place to the destiny as mentioned in the complaint.  Opposite party also admitted that  the fact of two pieces of checked-in baggage weighing 27 Kgs at London Airport.   As per the guidelines of Air India the complainant was required to keep his valuables in his hand bag. The opposite parties further stated  in the written version that the baggage of weighing 7 Kgs was not received at Mumbai Airport.  On lodging  the complaint by the complainant as to the non-arrival of his missed baggage weighing 7 Kgs at Mumbai, the opposite party No.1 issued property irregularity  report.

             It has also been stated in the written version that after waiting mandatory period of 21 days, despite best efforts, the opposite party could not trace the missed baggage of the complainant.  The claim of the complainant was settled on weight loss basis, as per the regulations of  IATA ( International Airport Transport Authority) which arrived  at Rs.11,201/- for 7 Kgs of missed baggage of complainant.  As per Montreal convention the opposite party stated that  the complainant is not entitled to any other amounts as per the  Property irregularity report along with the Customs  Declaration form (Landing Certificate)  wherein  it has been declared by the complainant that the  contents of the missed baggage were clothes, Liquor bottle, Iron Box, shaving kit and Chocolates (Ex.B2).  As the opposite parties  have settled the claim of the complainant as stated above, the opposite parties prayed that the complaint filed by the complainant deserves to be  dismissed with costs. 

  1. In the enquiry, the complainant got filed his evidence affidavit along with 11 documents which have been marked as Ex.A1 to A11.  The opposite parties have  got filed  3 documents  which have been marked as Ex.B1 to B3.
  2. Having perused the material brought on the record and having heard the arguments advanced by the parties  before us, the following points have emerged for consideration:
  1. Whether the complainant proved that there is any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties?
  2. Whether the complainant is entitled to the reliefs?
  3. To what relief?

Point No.1:  In view of the Provision of Section 11 (2) (a) of C.P.Act 1986 and establishment of branch office of opposite party No.1 at Hyderabad, the objection qua territorial jurisdiction  of this Hon’ble Forum to entertain this complaint is unsustainable and holds no water. 

           Ex.B2 is the property and irregularity report  and the settlement of the claim of the complainant  by the opposite  parties for missed checked-in baggage  weighing 7 Kgs in accordance with the regulations of IATA and arriving at payment of Rs.11,180/- appears to be proper.  The complainant  declared the contents of his missed baggage which are  clothes, Liquor bottles, Iron Box, shaving kit and Chocolates (Ex.B2).  The averments of  the complaint as to the missed baggage that it contained valuables  worth of Rs.3,00,000/- is an afterthought  of the missing of the baggage.  Thus answer to this point No.1 is infavour of the complainant but  against the opposite parties.

Point No.2&3: In the light of the above discussion, we have come to the  conclusion  to award Rs.5,000/- towards humiliation, mental agony, pain, anxiety and strain  suffered by the complainant ; and Rs.3,000/- towards  cost of the  litigation. 

           In the result, the complaint is  partly allowed and the opposite parties are jointly and severally  liable ;  and  are hereby directed to pay to the complainant

  1. Rs.11,180/- towards missing of the complainant’s baggage weighing 7 Kgs.
  2. Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for humiliation, mental agony, anxiety, stress and  trauma suffered by the complainant
  3. Rs.3,000/- towards cost of the  litigation.

Compliance of this order by the opposite parties within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order and in the event of failure, the amount i.e, Rs.11,180/- & Rs.5,000/- attracts 12% of interest  P.A.  

                          Dictated to steno, transcribed and typed by her, pronounced  by us on this the  13th day of December , 2019

 

 

LADYMEMBER                   MALEMEMBER                               PRESIDENT

 

 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

 

 

Exhibits filed on behalf of the Complainant:

Ex.A1 -   Acknowledgment of baggage

Ex.A2 –  Ticket

Ex.A3 – Boarding pass

Ex.A4 – Copy of  pass port

Ex.A5 –  Passenger property questionnaire

Ex.A6 –  Description of contents

Ex.A7 –  Galileo e- Ticket ( Transfer information)

Ex.A8 -   Check-in baggage Allowance

Ex.A9  -   copy of Opposite party mail

Ex.10   –   Complainant’s letter

Ex.A11 –  copy of opposite party mail

Exhibits  filed on behalf of the Opposite parties:

 Ex.B1 –  Landing  certificate (Customs Declaration)

 Ex.B2 -  Property irregularity report

 Ex.B3 – Email from baggage services (Mumbai) for settlement and claim

 

 

LADYMEMBER                   MALEMEMBER                               PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Ram Mohan]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. C.Lakshmi Prasanna]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.