BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.853 OF 2020

AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.112/2019,

DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY

Between:

1. Meeta Jain, W/o.Jitendra Jain,

    Aged about 51 years,

2. Jitendra Jain, S/o.Late Sh Mangal

    Chand Jain, aged about 54 years,

Both present residence, E7/1, RCI Colony,

RCI Road, P.O.Vignyana Kancha, P.O.

Hyderabad 500069,

(residence wef 01 Dec 2020 shall be Flat No.H28,

1302, AWHO, Sandeep Vihar, Whitefield – Hoskote

Rd, Kannamangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560115)

                                        .……Appellants/Complainants

And

1. Bharti Airtel, Bharti Airtel Limited

    (A Bharti Enterprise) Bharti Crescent,

    1 Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj,

    Phase II, New Delhi – 110 070

2. Chief General Manager Bharat Sncha

    Nigam Limited, Bharat Sanchar Bhavan

    Harish Chandra Mathur Lane

    Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001,

    Emails hcpant@bsnl.co.in., cmdcomplaints@bsnl.co.in.,

    crocharminar@bsnl.co.in., pgts_htd@bsnl.co.in

    ……….Represented by its Manager.

3. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of

    India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan

    (next to Zakir Hussain College) Jawaharlal

    Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)

    New Delhi: 110 002

    Email ID: ap@trai.gov.in

    Represented by its Manager.

   …..Respondents/Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Appellant/Complainants    : Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)

Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties  : M/s.Gopi Rajesh

                                                                        & Associates-R1

                                                                        Sri S.Prabhakar

  Reddy-R2

                                                                        Sri Sudhakar Rao

                                                                        Kulkarni-R3

QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Order :

1.      This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.112/2019 dated 29.10.2020 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

3.       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.