company-name-logo

Consumer Court in StateCommission

Latest Judgments

List of Consumer Court case in StateCommission. Total 9288 cases registered in StateCommission Consumer Court.

Chandigarh

AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED V/S KARANVIR GANDOTRA

Amazon   Amazon   Amazon Seller Services Private Limited  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH(Additional Bench)Appeal No.:06 of 2023Date of Institution:18.01.2023Date of Decision:02.03.2023Karanvir Gandotra s/o Sh.Mohinder Pratap Gandotra, aged about 61 years, Resident of # 3455, Sector 40-D, Chandigarh 160036 ...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2023

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2023

Chandigarh

BIJENDER SINGH BUDWAR V/S COUNTRY CLUB FITNESS AND VACATIONS

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PRADEEP SHARMA B.L. SHARMA AND SUKHVIR VOHRA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 182

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2023

Chandigarh

SH. SATISH GUPTA V/S NIDHI MEHRA

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJESH VERMA & MUKESH VERMA ADV.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Addl. Bench]===========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/84/2022Date of Institution:29/11/2022Date of Decision:28/02/20231] Nidhi Mehra wife of Sh. Manoj Bawra, Resident of House No. 3622, Near Shiv Mandir, Sector 23-D, Chandi...

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Chandigarh

EMAAR INDIA LIMITED V/S MUKUL GOYAL

Emaar  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SAVINDER SINGH GILL ADV.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Addl. Bench]Consumer Complaint No.:CC/72/2022Date of Institution:28/09/2022Date of Decision:28/02/20231] Mukul Goyal son of Sh. R.D. Goyal, Resident of GF-15, Hans Bhawan, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002....

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2023

Chandigarh

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Jagvir Singh Kang

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arjun Sharma & Ramandeep Kaleka Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Addl. Bench]Consumer Complaint No.:CC/46/2022Date of Institution:24/05/2022Date of Decision:28/02/2023Jagvir Singh Kang son of Sh. Inderjit Singh, Resident of V.P.O. Kotla Shamsher Ludhiana, Punjab, presently residing ...

Case Number: 46

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Chandigarh

M/s Gupta Builders and Promoters Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ramnik Pal Singh Patheja

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma & Mukesh Verma Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Addl. Bench]============Consumer Complaint No.:CC/38/2022Date of Institution:25/04/2022Date of Decision:28/02/2023Ramnik Pal Singh Patheja, son of Gobinderpal Singh Patheja, Resident of Flat No. 108, FF, Tower 1, Gatew...

Case Number: 38

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Chandigarh

MUSARRAT JAHAN V/S M/S IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PARBODH PRAVEZ & CHUGH ASSOCIATES LLP

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 165

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2023

Chandigarh

Raj Kumar V/S Shri Sai Hospital, Multispeciality & Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery Centre

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Munish Kapila Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:03 of 2022Date of Institution:07.01.2022Date of Decision:27.02.20231] Shri Sai Hospital, A Multispecialty & Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery Centre, 112/77, 10 Cross Road, Near Prakat Shiv Mandir, Ambala Ca...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2023

Chandigarh

HDFC Bank V/S Naveen Daryal

HDFC Bank   HDFC Bank   Hdfc  

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Brijendra Singh Bajwa Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:39 of 2022Date of Institution:05.04.2023Date of Decision:24.02.2023Sh. Naveen Daryal, aged 53 years son of Sh. Om Parkash Daryal, resident of House No.2528-B, Sector 47-C, U.T., Chandigarh.…..Appellant...

Case Number: 39

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2023

Chandigarh

NAVEEN SHARMA DELHI SHIMLA GOODS CARRIERS V/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Consumer Court: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SUKHDARSHAN SINGH ADVOCATE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 150

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

What is the Consumer Forum?

Consumer Forum StateCommission, also known as the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum of StateCommission - Chandigarh, is established to protect consumer rights and provide a swift and cost-effective solution for consumer complaints. Consumer Forum StateCommission provides a platform for consumers of StateCommission - Chandigarh to file complaints against unfair trade practices by the seller, any type of defect in products, or deficient services. There are three levels of Consumer Forum – District Forum i.e StateCommission, State Forum i.e. State Commission consumer forum, and National Forum, each with varying jurisdictions. The main purpose of StateCommission consumer forum is to safeguarding consumers' interests and promoting ethical business practices by holding companies accountable for any violations of consumer rights.

Who can file a complaint before a StateCommission Consumer Forum?

In general, any consumer who has purchased goods or availed any service for the personal use can file a complaint before a StateCommission Consumer Forum.

Defination of Consumer in THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019

(7) "consumer" means any person who—

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

(ii) hires or avails of any service for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such service other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person, but does not include a person who avails of such service for any commercial purpose.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) the expression "commercial purpose" does not include use by a person of goods bought and used by him exclusively for the purpose of earning his livelihood, by means of self-employment;
(b) the expressions "buys any goods" and "hires or avails any services" includes offline or online transactions through electronic means or by teleshopping or direct selling or multi-level marketing;

What type of cases can be filed in Consumer Forum?

If you have any disputes and grievances related to your purchase of goods or services and the company is not solving your problem even after filing complaint to the customer care, you can file case against that company in Consumer Forum.

Defective Goods : Consumer can file cases if the purchased goods are defective, substandard, or not as described.

Deficient Services : Complaints regarding services that are deficient or not as promised.

Unfair Trade Practices : Unfair trade practices such as misleading advertisements, false representations, or deceptive business practices.

Overcharging or Unjust Pricing : Complaints related to overpricing, price manipulation, or charging more than the specified.

Faulty Products : Issues arising from products that are unsafe to use, pose health hazards, or do not meet safety standards.

Delay in Services : Cases where there is an unreasonable delay in providing services, causing inconvenience to the consumer.

Product Liability : Instances where a product causes harm or injury due to design defects, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings.

Unsatisfactory Professional Services : Disputes arising from services provided by professionals such as doctors, architects, etc.

E-commerce Transactions : Complaints related to the online purchases, including non-delivery of item, quality, or non-compliance with terms and conditions.

What is the procedure of filing the case in StateCommission consumer Forum

When you have not received any satisfactory response from the seller even after contacting to their customer care or even submitting your complaint in anyway, the next step is to file your case in the StateCommission consumer Forum. Before filing a case, you need to send a Legal Notice to the opposite party for dispute resolution. If there's no response or resolution within the stipulated time, you can file your case in the StateCommission consumer Forum.

What is the time limit for filing a case in StateCommission Consumer Forum?

As per THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 , The District Commission, the State Commission or the National Commission shall not admit a complaint unless it is filed within two years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.