
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MOHINDER J. S. RUPAL & DR. SHWETA BAJAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 08/04/2015 in Complaint No. 181/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/3470/2015,IA/8438/20161. UMESH GUPTAS/O. SH. R.S.GUPTA, R/O. N-6/12, DLF QUTUB ENCLAVE,GURGAO...
Case Number: 525
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satyaveer Singh
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:271 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:17-Aug-17Sanjay Kakar son of Sh.Ramesh Kumar Kakar, Resident of House No.1614, Sector 44-B, New Delhi-110014.…… ComplainantV e r...
Case Number: 271
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raja Bahadur Singh Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:271 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:17-Aug-17Sanjay Kakar son of Sh.Ramesh Kumar Kakar, Resident of House No.1614, Sector 44-B, New Delhi-110014.…… ComplainantV e r...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:271 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:17-Aug-17Sanjay Kakar son of Sh.Ramesh Kumar Kakar, Resident of House No.1614, Sector 44-B, New Delhi-110014.…… ComplainantV e r...
Case Number: 322
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:271 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:17-Aug-17Sanjay Kakar son of Sh.Ramesh Kumar Kakar, Resident of House No.1614, Sector 44-B, New Delhi-110014.…… ComplainantV e r...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:271 of 2017Date of Institution:30.03.2017Date of Decision:17-Aug-17Sanjay Kakar son of Sh.Ramesh Kumar Kakar, Resident of House No.1614, Sector 44-B, New Delhi-110014.…… ComplainantV e r...
Case Number: 405
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:308 of 2017Date of Institution:10.04.2017Date of Decision:16-Aug-17Charan Kamal Singh Ahuja son of Sh.G.S. Ahuja, resident of G-24, First Floor, Saket, New Delhi-110017.…… ComplainantV e...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:308 of 2017Date of Institution:10.04.2017Date of Decision:16-Aug-17Charan Kamal Singh Ahuja son of Sh.G.S. Ahuja, resident of G-24, First Floor, Saket, New Delhi-110017.…… ComplainantV e...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:308 of 2017Date of Institution:10.04.2017Date of Decision:16-Aug-17Charan Kamal Singh Ahuja son of Sh.G.S. Ahuja, resident of G-24, First Floor, Saket, New Delhi-110017.…… ComplainantV e...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Pardeep Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/613/20171. Jagwant Singh Gillthrough power of attorney Amandeep Singh Cheema son of Gurjant Singh, resident of 8054, Sunny Enclave, Sector-125, Mohali, Punjab............Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 613
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.