company-name-logo

Tpddl

Latest Judgments

Total 228 Consumer Court Cases Against Tpddl.

Delhi

TPDDL V/S VIRENDER

Tpddl  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/664/20151. VIRENDERB-2672,NARELA NEW DLEHI-40...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TPDDLHUDSON LINE KINGSWAY CAMP,NEW DELHI-09............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. PROMILA SETH MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTI...

Case Number: 664

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2015

Delhi

TPDDL V/S ADEEL SIDDIQUI

Tpddl  

Court Name: North

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,TIS HAZARI, DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/67/20151. ADEEL SIDDIQUICH NO-190, W. WING, TIS HAZARI COURTSDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TPDDLHUDSON LINES, KINGSWAY CAMPDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sh. Babu Lal PR...

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 29-04-2015

Delhi

TPDDL V/S SUMER CHAND

Tpddl  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-V, (NORTH- WEST), CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, NEW DELHI-110088Complaint Case No. CC/279/20151. SUMER CHAND236 A/14,RISHI NAGAR,SHAKUR BASTI,DELHI-34...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TPDDLHUDSON LANE,KINGSWAY CAMP,NEW DELHI........

Case Number: 279

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2017

Delhi

TPDDL V/S RAM PYARE

Tpddl  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/1474/2014( Date of Filing : 05 Dec 2014 )1. RAM PYAREC-100 T HUTS GP PITAMPURA BLOCK-C DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TPDDLH...

Case Number: 1474

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-04-2019

NCDRC

M/S. TPDDL V/S RK ROHILLA

Tpddl  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 270/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RK ROHILLA201, 2ND FLOOR,BHANOT BHAWAN, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AZADPUR, DELHI - 110033...........Peti...

Case Number: 2930

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2013

NCDRC

M/S. TPDDL V/S RK ROHILLA

Tpddl  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2931 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 271/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RK ROHILLA201, 2ND FLOOR,BHANOT BHAWAN, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AZADPUR, DELHI - 110033...........Peti...

Case Number: 2931

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2013

NCDRC

M/S. TPDDL V/S RK ROHILLA

Tpddl  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 272/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RK ROHILLA201, 2ND FLOOR, BHANOT BHAWAN, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AZADPURDELHI - 110033...........Petit...

Case Number: 2932

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2013

NCDRC

M/S. TPDDL V/S RK ROHILLA

Tpddl  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 273/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RK ROHILLA201, 2ND FLOOR,BHANOT BHAWAN, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AZADPUR,DELHI - 110033...........Petit...

Case Number: 2933

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tpddl in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tpddl ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Tpddl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.