Toyota
Latest Judgments
Total 577 Consumer Court Cases Against Toyota.
TOYOTA INDIA. V/S TARUN AGGARWAL.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate VARUN CHAWLA.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:229 of 2015Date of Institution:19.10.2015Date of Decision:30.11.2016Tarun Aggarwal s/o Sh.Arun Aggarwal, R/o H.No.345, Sukhna Enclave, Village Kansal, Mohali, Punjab-160055.….Complainan...
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
TIRATH SINGH OBEROI V/S M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANR
Toyota Kirloskar Toyota Kirloskar
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate MR. PRADEEP GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2944 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 07/05/2008 in Appeal No. 841/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANRPlot No. 1, Bidadi Industrial Area, Ramnagar TalukBa...
Case Number: 2944
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD V/S U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITES
Toyota Kirloskar Toyota Kirloskar
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate P.YADHUKUMAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/7031. U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITESEDAVETTY P.O.,THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI-685588...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTDREPRESENTED BY ITS CEO,HEAD OFFICE,PLOT NO.1,BIDADI...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2016
Pasang Tshering Sherpa V/S Topsel Toyota
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Mr. Debasish De Mr. Debasish Das
Respondant Advocate Mr. Prasanta Banerjee.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/330/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/02/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/30/2014 of District Darjeeling)1. Topsel ToyotaRegd. & Head Office at 25, Ganesh Cha...
Case Number: 330
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
The Manager Toyota Kirloskar Motors V/S Savita Kumari
Toyota Kirloskar Toyota Kirloskar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Deepak Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :03/10/2016ORDER As per office report, amount of Rs.74012/- has been deposited in the account of President. Sh. Deepak Goyal, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he withdraws this execution application with the...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar
Toyota Kirloskar Toyota Kirloskar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Deep Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :30/09/2016ORDER None has turned up on behalf of complainant / decree holder. Case has been called several times since morning. Accordingly, the application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is dismissed in default. Certified copy of this order be commun...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
The Manager Toyota Kirloskar Motors V/S Savita Kumari
Toyota Kirloskar Toyota Kirloskar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma Adv, & Dhriti J Sharma Adv.
Dated : 20/09/2016ORDER Certified copy of the order dated 19.08.2016 of the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi has been filed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Be registered. An application for deposit of the amount in compliance of ...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
MFG TOYOTA V/S M.M.SHARMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S.DHULL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 147 of 2016Date of Institution: 17.02.2016Date of Decision : 20.09.2016M.M. Sharma s/o Sh. Suresh Sharma, Resident of 42, Karanpuri, behind B.D. Flour Mill, Ambala Cantt, Haryana. Appellant-Complain...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2016
Toyota Commercial Toyota V/S Samar Ali Hashmi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R. P. Johari
Respondant Advocate Ram Raj
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/1433(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Samar Ali Hashmi A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Toyota Commercial ToyotaA..........
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2005
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
M/S. MILLINIUM TOYOTA AND ANR. V/S SHRI. SWAGAT BIPIN SANGHVI
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate ADV.RAMAKANT B. RANE
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/301/20151. SHRI. SWAGAT BIPIN SANGHVIDEVDAL SAGPADA POST, KAMAN VASAI RAOD. DIST. PALGHAR...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Toyota in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Toyota ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Toyota under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.