
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.B. PANDEY & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 16/02/2016 in Complaint No. 84/2016 of the State Commission Delhi)1. TARUN AGGARWALS/O. SH. KAMAL KISHOR AGGARWAL, R/O. A-710, JANATA FLATS, SECTOR-2, AVANTIKA , ROHINI, ...
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1065 of 2015Date of Institution: 14.12.2015Date of Decision : 03.02.20171. TDI Infrastructure Limited through its Managing Director, UG Floor, Vandana Building, 11, Tolstoy Marg, Cannaught Place, N...
Case Number: 1065
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 486 of 2015Date of Institution: 27.05.2015Date of Decision : 03.02.20171. TDI Infrastructure Limited through its Managing Director, UG Floor, Vandana Building, 11, Tolstoy Marg, Cannaught Place, Ne...
Case Number: 486
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.B.AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 257 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 02.09.2016 Date of Decision: 19.12.2016Varun Gupta son of Sh. Sushil Bhushan Gupta, Resident of House No.3/93, Mall Road, Karnal, Haryana.…..Complainan...
Case Number: 257
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2017
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.D.Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Execution Petition No. : EA/111 of 2016INSTITUTED ON : 04/07/2016DATE OF ORDER : 22/11/2016Smt. Kamal Kanta wife of Surender Saluja resident of H.No. 1243, Sector- 44, Sonepat.……… Compla...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision : 24.11.2016Date of arguments heard : 16.11.2016Complaint Case No.422/2014Harjinder Singh BrarS/o Sh. Mal Singh BrarR/o V.P.O. Malke Via,Kotkupar...
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MANNU MALIK
Respondant Advocate TEJINDER RATHI
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Execution Petition No. : EA/18 of 2013INSTITUTED ON : 17.01.2013DATE OF ORDER : 15.11.2016Mukesh Aggawal S/o Shri R.P. Aggarwal through its Attorney holder Shri Sunny Gupta S/o Ashok Gupta, Resident of House...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANCHIT GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1477 OF 20161. DR. SHAMMI JAINW/o Dr. Alok Rastogi R/o 66-UB, Jawahar NagarDelhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDRegd. Off. 9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi ...........Opp.Par...
Case Number: 1477
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANCHIT GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1478 OF 20161. SANDEEP SACHIN & 3 ORS. KP-22, MAURYA ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA,NEW DELHI.2. SMT. APARNA SACHIN SHARMA KP-22, MAURYA ENCLAVE, PITAM PURA, NEW DLEHI3. CAPTAIN MANOJ ABHISHEK KP-22, MAURYA ENCLAVE, P...
Case Number: 1478
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 19.08.2016First Appeal No. 897/2012(Arising out of the order dated 26.03.2013 passed in Complaint Case No. 378/2010 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Foru...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.