
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJNIKANT UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.329 of 2017 Date of Institution: 25.05.2017 Date of Decision: 20.07.2017Sanjay Kumar Gahlawat age 45 years S/o Sh.Ramphal Gahlawat R/o H.No.51, Housing Board Colony, Sector-23, Sonepat.…..Compl...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 207
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 04.05.2017Complaint Case No. 118/2012In the matter of:Sh. Amitabh NangiaS/o Late Sh. C B NangiaR/o C-15/12, ArjunNargDLF City Phase IGurgaon Haryana-122002 ...........
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.948 of 2015Date of the Institution:28.10.2015Date of Decision:02.05.2017Rakesh Kaushik son of Dharam Kaushik, resident of House No.980, Sector-15, Part-II, Gurgaon, Haryana. .….AppellantVersus1....
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.S.PANWAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.948 of 2015Date of the Institution:28.10.2015Date of Decision:02.05.2017Rakesh Kaushik son of Dharam Kaushik, resident of House No.980, Sector-15, Part-II, Gurgaon, Haryana. .….AppellantVersus1....
Case Number: 948
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 25.04.17 Date of decision : 01.05.17 Complaint No. 1129/2015In the matter of:1.Mr. Mahboob Alam Qureshi R/on2184, Qasimjan Street Ballimaran, Delhi-110006.2. Mr. J...
Case Number: 1129
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.MONGA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 550 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 15.06.2016 Date of Decision: 25.04.2017M/s TDI Infrastructure Limited (formerly M/s Intime Promoters (P) Limited) through its Authorized Signature Amit Batra...
Case Number: 550
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Naresh Sharma
Respondant Advocate Tejinder Rathee
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Execution Petition No. EA/176 of 2015 INSTITUTED ON : 20.11.2015 DATE OF ORDER: 15.03.2017Tilak Raj son of Ram Kishan Sharma, resident of Village Rathdhana, District Sonepat, the decree Holder hereby apply for exrcut...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHISH MIDDHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1195 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 22/07/2016 in Complaint No. 321/2015 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, 8 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG NEW DELHI...
Case Number: 1195
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.B. PANDEY & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 280 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 16/02/2016 in Complaint No. 1010/2015 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RAJ KISHORES/O. SH. TRILOK SINGH, R/O. G-26/196, SECTOR-3, ROHINI, DELHI-110085...........Appellant...
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.