
Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, TUMAKURUOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/177/2012( Date of Filing : 11 Oct 2012 )1. T S BAKULAMMADERITUMAKURU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PROPRIETOR , SAMPATH SONY CENTER TUMAKURU............Opp.Party(s)...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2020
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate JOSON MANAVALAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/3651. ASHA RAHMANW/O P.M ADIMA, 1/1100 PADAMUGAL, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30 REP. BY HER SON AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ZIAD RAHMAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CONTOUR READYMIX PVT LTD REP. BY ITS MANAGI...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 610 of 2012 1. Shivam Garg ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sony Ericsson ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : ...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/3911. Saji SonySanthosh Vilasam, Kanjiramkulam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Balu, Mars-Inn Home MateMalayinkil, TVPM............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sri G. S...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/09/2791. Khaitan & Co.Emerald House, 1B, Old Post Office Street, Kolkata-700001.KolkataWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.A-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. TRANS INDIA LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 662 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/03/2012 in Complaint No. 24/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 3 ORS.6TH FLOOR, RELIANCE HOUSE, NO. 6, HADDOWWN ROAD, NA...
Case Number: 662
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2013
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/7201. GEORGE SONY JOSEPHSRA-19,CRASH ROAD,SAUHRADA NAGAR,THRIKKAKARA P.O.KOCHI-682 021...........Complainant(s)Versus1. WHIRLPOOL SERVICE CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGERJ.M.ASSOCIATES,PARIARATH BUILDI...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KOLLEMKODE.D.S.JAYACHANDRAN
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/12/188(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/12/2011 in Case No. CC/11/127 of District Idukki)1. GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCEPALA ROAD,THODU PUZHAIDUKKIKERALA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/2991. Vishnu S. AmbadiSivaprasadam, Pangode, Thirumala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Mobile Commn and 2 othersDakha House, New Delhi2. Accel Care CentreThycaud3. Un...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/12051. Madhukar Gunjan ChakhaiyarNo.-28, 2nd Floor, 1st Cross, Duo Enclave Layout, Kodichikannahalli Main Roa...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.