
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/13/531. Ankur Borwankar, S/o Abhaya Borwankar,R/o B-1002, Tiara Apts., Ivory Estates, Baner Rd., Pune-411 021............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Ltd.,A-31, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Rd., New Delhi-110 044.2. Accel Frontline Serv...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. G.V.R. CHOUDARY & MR. A. CHANDRA SEKHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 814 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 433/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) WITH IA/1477/2013,IA/1478/20131. JANACHAITANYA HOUSING LTD. & 2 ORS.REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & ...
Case Number: 814
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/4541. Shailesh Sheshrao GadekarNikam Building 7,Kalas-malwadi Road,Near Marathi(pmc)school,Opp Ganga Kalash AlandiRoad,next to vishrantwadi,Kalas pune 411015PuneMaha2. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Ericssion CompanySony Mobile communication,1st ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/167/20121. Sibin. C.B, Chennakkattu House, Kottapadi Post,Wayanad.Kerala............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor, Century Decorations, Sony complex, Pinangode road, Kalpetta.Wayanad.Kerala.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Jose V. Thanniko...
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Hyundai Hyundai Sony Hyundai Motor
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/53/20101. Sony LazarusVellappattu(H),Kizhathadiyoor.p.o,Pala,Kottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Hyundai motor india ltdA-30,Mohan cooperative industrial estate,mathura road,New Delhi rep by its managing direc...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DINESH JOSHI
Respondant Advocate NISHCHALA JOSHI
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/553(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/11/2002 in Case No. CC/98/632 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. SONY INDIA PVT.LTD.A-31, MOHAN CO-OP. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI BEFORE:H...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate P.D. Jose
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. OP/05/1261. K.J. JoyKollengadan House, Kuttanellur. BEFORE:HONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT Sasidharan M.S Member PRESENT:P.D. Jose, Advocate for the Complainant 1 ORDERBy Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, Preside...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/466/20121. SHAMEEM SULAIMAN'SUNSHINE' POTTASSERY MANASSERY,MUKKAM 673602...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY ERICSSON CERTIFIED SERVICE CENTRE"CARE POINT" OPP.APSARA THEATRE RAILWAY LINK ROAD KOZHIKODE-673002............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 589 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 28/11/2011 in Appeal No. 1093/2006 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1042/20131. DR. PAWAN GUPTA & ANR.C/O GUPTA CLINIC & DAY CARE CENTRE, RAILWAY ROAD, BAHA...
Case Number: 589
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 602 of 2012 1. Ranjan Shahid/o Late Sh. R.K. Shahi, r/o H.No. 3070, Sector 40D, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sony Ericson Mobile Communi...
Case Number: 602
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.