
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate H.M. Sudhkar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Forum,Hosmane Extension, Near IB, Chikmagalur-577 101CAUSELISTComplaint Case No. CC/101/20151. Ithias Gowda, Vijaypura Extension, ChikkamagaluruChikmagalur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Sony India Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi And ...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate MS. S. RASHMI SHARMA
Respondant Advocate R.K Vig
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 301 of 2013 Date of Institution : 20.11.2013 Date of decision : 22.11.2016 Sanjay Sharma son of Dr. Kali Ram Sharma, resident of house n...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/266/20161. Ranjeet Singh4/14 Hig(L) sarsuna Hsg Estate, Phase-ll Biren Roy Road(W), Kol-61.2. Pratibad SinghN-356, B-8, Top Floor, B.P township, Opposite ...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2016
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, EAST, Govt of NCT Delhi CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, 1st FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI 110092 Consumer complaint no. 217 /2015 Date of Institution 27/03/2015 Order Reserved on 16/11 /2016 Date of Order 17/11 /2016 In matter ofMr. ...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate Sunil Kumar
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution : 26.08.14Complaint Case No.558-14 Date of order : 15.11.16In the matter of :Ms. Priyanka YadavD/o Mr. Shri Bhagwan...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ROHAN MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.816 of 2015Date of the Institution:28.09.2015Date of Decision: 15.11.2016Sony India Pvt. Ltd., A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Registered office at A-31, Mohan Cooperati...
Case Number: 816
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:174 of 2016Date of Institution:12.07.2016Date of Decision:11.11.2016Virender Singth son of Shri Karam Singh resident of House No. 934, Sec-21, Panchkula, Haryana. ….ComplainantVersus1....
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate D.P.Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No. 63 of 25.01.2016Date of Decision:11.11.2016A.S.Grewal, Advocate, Chamber NO.813, 8th Floor, Lawyer Chambers Complex, District Courts, Ludhiana.….. ComplainantVersus1.Sony India Pvt.Ltd., A-31, Moha...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate AMARDEEP SHARMA.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:123 of 2016Date of Institution:24.05.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2016 Dinesh Kumar son of Nand Lal Pahwa, resident of House No. 1286, Sector- 15, Panchkula. ….ComplainantVersusM/s Sony In...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Said Istekhar Hasan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2754/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/10/2016 in Case No. C/58/2015 of District Ghaziabad)1. Samar JhaGhaziabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. So...
Case Number: 2754
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.