
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Mr. N.S.Jagdeva, Adv. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 340 of 2012 1. N.S.Jagdevas/o Ranjit Singh r/o H.No. 1071, Sector 38-B, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Tashi Shoes (A Tata Enterprises) th...
Case Number: 340
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURCC NO. 315 Of 20111. Dineshan P,Shabiya, Nr. Edachovva UP School Road, Chovva, Kannur 6Kannur Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Proprietor, Sylcon, A Unit of Zain ShoesHK Caltex, 349B/349C, Caltex Junction, 670001KannurKerala....
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 234 Of 20111. MANOJ.K.RSTHAPATHI ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS, THIRUVAMBADY [PO], CALICUT 673603...........Complainant(s)Versus1. METRO SHOES LTD6/1131 F, WEST END.MAL.C., FLY OVER JUNCTION, CHEROOTY ROAD, CALICUT 673001. ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadh...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 176 Of 20111. P.T.ASSAIN KUTTY,S/O.P.T. ALIKUTTY HAJI,PEEDIKA THODUKAYIL HOUSE,KODUVALLY PO,KOZHIKODE............Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER METRO SHOES LTD,6/1131-F,WEST END MALL,C FLY OVER JUNCTION,CHEROOTTY ROAD,KOZHIKODE.673001.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOUR...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KottayamConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Civil Station, KottayamCC NO. 173 Of 2010 1. Smt Geetha SAsst Mgr, Oriental Insurance Co LTd, Divisional Office, Ktym ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M\s Sylcon Sarah ShoesMallcelhara Commercial Complex Baker Junc, Ktym ...........Respon...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate B.T.Kamala
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYANo.2083/1, Subhash Nagar, 1st Cross, Mandya-571401consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/82 Sri.B.T.Ramesh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Bata Shoes Centre ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)Execution Application(EA) No. EA/08/30 M.K.Ponnappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Proprietor, Manna Shoes ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. A.S.Hemalatha 2. K.S.Prasad C...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CIVIL STATIONconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/216 K RAJATH ...........Appellant(s)Vs.SELECTION SHOES AND BAGS ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. G YADUNADHAN2. JAYASREE KALLAT3. K.V.SREENIVASAN Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): OppositeParty/Res...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate MSB
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/1864 Manjunatha Gowda ...........Appella...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/60 M.K.Ponnappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Proprietor, Manna Shoes ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. A.S.Hemalatha 2. K.S.Prasad 3. M.R.Deva...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Shoes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Shoes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Shoes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.