
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Kumar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/288/2016Date of Institution:28/04/2016Date of Decision:20/09/2016Kapil Kundu, House No.2740-B, Sector 42-C, Chandigarh…..ComplainantV E R S U SM/s College Shoes (Woodland Store), SCO No....
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 24/08/2016ORDER Sh. Satbinder Singh, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint to enable him to file revised petition as per revised format. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, ...
Case Number: 459
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Complainant Inperson
Respondant Advocate A.K.Bali
Harsh Kumar vs. Metro Shoes.CC No. 180 of 2016.Present: Sh. Harsh Kumar complainant in person. Sh. A.K.Bali, Advocate, counsel for OP. Complainant made a statement that compromise has been effected with the OP and he withdraws the present complaint being fully satisfied, which m...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2016
Court Name: Belgaum
Appelant Advocate S S Genannavar
Respondant Advocate
IN THE DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMBELAGAVIComplaint Case No. CC/180/20161. Mohammad I MullaR/o: Shahu Nagar Belagavi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. METRO SHOES LTDCTS No.1677, Kriloskar Road Belagavi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V Gudli PRESID...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None Appeared.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALACASE NO: CC- 21 of 2016Sri Goutam Saha, 72, H.G.B. Road, Melarmath, Agartala, West Tripura. …..….…...Complainant.VERSUS Action Exclusive Shoe Room, M/S Rahul Garments, Prop. Manoj Kothari, H...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2016
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/545/20151. DILEEP KUMAR E NEDAPPATTU HO, CHETTIYAM PARAMBU PO, KELAKAM, KANNUR 670674...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER/MANAGING DIRECTOR,PONDY SHOESJAYA AUDITORIUM, CALICUT............Opp.Party...
Case Number: 545
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2016
Court Name: Nagaur
Appelant Advocate Sh Arif Khan
Respondant Advocate Sh Anil Gour
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/90/20141. harnarayan Gour Nagaur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bhavay Shoes CollectionNagaur............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Brijlal Meena PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Balveer KhuKhudiya MEMBER For the Complainant:Sh Arif Khan, ...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2016
Court Name: Meerut
Appelant Advocate M. Irrfan
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/308/2014( Date of Filing : 27 Sep 2014 )1. Imran Jamuna Nagar Near P.A.C Hapur Road Meerut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Libarty Shoes & Other171 Abuane Meerut Cantt............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PRESENT:Dated : 30 Dec 2015 Final Order...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2021
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/544/20151. ABDUL HAKKEEM A PALIPARAMBATH HO, MALAYAMMA PO, NIT VIA, CALICUT 673601...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ANVAR,PROPRIETOR,INC.5 SHOES PVT LTD1163, CHELOOR BUILDING, NEAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,...
Case Number: 544
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2015
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Gakhar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No.: 22 of 2015 Date of Institution : 27.01.2015 Date of Decision : 13.08.2015Preeti Gakhar D/o Sh. Krishan Lal, resident of House No.541, Sonia Colony, Ambala City. ...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Shoes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Shoes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Shoes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.