
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionCivil Station , Kollam-691013.Kerala.Complaint Case No. CC/29/2020( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2020 )1. Shamnaj.R, Reghu Bhavanam,Alappadu, Cheriazheekal P.O, Karunagappally,Kollam-690573............Complainant(s)Versus1. Royal Enfield Motor Cyc...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2022
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPRESENT SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT SMT.PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER SRI.VIJU.V.R : MEMBERCC.NO.254/2019 (Filed on : 09/08/2019)ORDER DATED : 29/07/2022COMPLAINANTArun G Krishnan,S/o.S.Gopalakrishnan Nai...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2022
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/187/2021( Date of Filing : 28 Dec 2021 )1. Jaffer Sherif A.A, Aged 28 Years, Pothanpadam (H), kunnambatta (PO), Pin:673123KunnambattaWayanadKerala ...........Complai...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2022
Court Name: Thiruvallur
Appelant Advocate Party in Person
Respondant Advocate -
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTHIRUVALLURNo.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,THIRUVALLUR-602 001Complaint Case No. CC/8/2020( Date of Filing : 31 Jan 2020 )1. S.GnanamS/o M.Subramaniam, No.11, 5th Cross Street, Thirumal Nagar, Poonamallee, Chennai-600 056. Tiruv...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2022
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 432 OF 2022Avinash Kumar Vs Royal Enfield BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Dated : 9th May 2022ORDER Complaint was received t...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2022
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1854/2018( Date of Filing : 16 Nov 2018 )1. Mr.Tony Mari Raj,S/o.Late.Arokiaswamy, Aged about 47 Years,R/at No.58, 8th Cross,8th Main,BEML Colony, T.C.Palya,K.R.Puram, Bengaluru-560036. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager Royal Enfi...
Case Number: 1854
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2022
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/117/2020( Date of Filing : 29 Jun 2020 )1. MUHAMMED YASIL ISMAIL.KKAIPAKIL (HO),VALIYAPARAMBA PO,KODUVALLY,KOZHIKODE-673572...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ROYAL ENFIELD (HEAD OFFICE)NO 624,TIRUVOT...
Case Number: 117
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2022
Court Name: East Khasi Hills
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. CC/36/2018( Date of Filing : 06 Nov 2018 )1. Shri John Franky Rymbai Golflinks Shillong 793001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor M/s Merin's Royal EnfieldGolflinks, Polo ...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2022
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Anuj Sharma
Respondant Advocate JS Arneja OP No.1&2
CC No.401 of 2021.Rajat Kumar Vs. Royal Enfield.Present:Shri Anuj Sharma, Adv. for the complainant. Shri JS Arneja, Adv. for the respondents No.1 & 2. (Notice of complaint was not ordered against respondent No.3). Keeping in view even dated separate statement suffered by ...
Case Number: 401
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2022
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Virender Singh
Respondant Advocate
CC No.395 of 2021.Rajat Kumar Versus Royal Enfield.Present: Shri Virender Singh, Adv. for the complainant. Complaint presented before the registry of this Commission on 29.11.2021 and put up before this Commission on today itself. It is hereby ordered to be registered against th...
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Royal Enfield in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Royal Enfield ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Royal Enfield under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.