
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/17/2291. JAYAKRISHNANKOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ROYAL ENFIELDKOCHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAK...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/17/3431. DEEPAK LALWANI390,DG-III,VIKASPURI,DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ROYAL ENFIELD LTD.NO 624,THIRUVOTTIYUR HIGH ROAD,TIRUVOTTIYUR,NEAR THIR...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PULKIT DAGAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 608 of 2017Date of Institution: 18.05.2017Date of Decision: 20.07.2017Vaibhav Bhasin son of Shri Sunil Kumar Bhasin, resident of House No.416, Sector 16, Urban Estate, Karnal.Appellant-ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 608
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2017
Court Name: Bagalkot
Appelant Advocate S B Patil
Respondant Advocate
Sri S.B.P. Advocate filed Memo. Complainant and Respondent settled the matter. Hence not interested proceeds the case. Hence case is dismissed....
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate SSM
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. CC/103/2013( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 2013 )1. Sri. Raghavendra Krishna A Research Scholar, aged about 27 years, S/o. Krishna NITK Surathkal, Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2018
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Satish Chander
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No. : CC/117 OF 2016 Instituted on : 25.04.2016 Date of order : 16.12.2016Amarjeet son of Shri Satpal Singh, resident of 173/27, Garhi Ghasita, behind Hindu Collage Sonipat.&hellip...
Case Number: 117
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate G.S.Dhaliwal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/555/20161. Gurpreet SinghS/o Khushia Singh R/o Shiv Shakti Vatika Sanghera Road Colony BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Royal Enfield1. Royal Enfield a unit of Motors Ltd Thiruvottiyur High Road, Thiruvotiyur Chenail thro...
Case Number: 555
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Debasis Nandi. Mr. Anjan Chakraborty.
Respondant Advocate Mr. Tarun Chakraborty. Mr . Prabir Kr.Basu.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/1391/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/10/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/60/2010 of District Kolkata-I(North))1. M/s. Royal Enfield(A Unit of Eicher Motors ...
Case Number: 1391
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2016
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate P.Ilayaraja
Respondant Advocate OP1 S.Vimal
Final Order1Final Order2Execution Application No. EA/12/2014InComplaint Case No. CC/39/20141. VasanthNo.154, VII-cross,Dr.Radhakrishnan nagar, Moolakulam, Puducherry-605 010...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Royal EnfieldRep. by its managing Director Thiruvotiyur High Road Thiruvoti...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.Vimal
Respondant Advocate S.Radajagopalane
Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/1/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/09/2014 in Case No. A/01/2015 of District Pondicherry)1. M/s Royal Enfield A Unit of Eicher Motors Limited Through Manager,Customer Service Tiruvottiyur High Road, Chennai-600 019M/s Royal Enfield A Unit of Ei...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Royal Enfield in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Royal Enfield ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Royal Enfield under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.