Royal Dutch Airlines
Latest Judgments
Total 19 Consumer Court Cases Against Royal Dutch Airlines.
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Gurlal Singh
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate TS Gill
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/23/385( Date of Filing : 05 Oct 2023 )1. Gurlal SinghVillage Sant nagar Distt SirsaSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesWest end Hotel RC Road Banglore GPOBangloreKarnataka............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Pada...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2023
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2024
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and another V/S Venkataraman Subramanian
Court Name: Tiruvannamalai
Appelant Advocate K. Sumathi
Respondant Advocate op1 & 2 M/s.A.R.Takkar
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2024
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2024
CHAND MEHRA & ORS. V/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1013
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2024
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Gaurav Johari
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Palvinder Singh Sarna Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:948 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:23.10.2017Gaurav Johris/o Sh.Vijay Johri, aged about 30 years, R/o H.No.2323, Sector 44-C, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1...
Case Number: 948
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Simran Sehgal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Palvinder Singh Sarna Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:949 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:23.10.2017Simran Sehgal D/o S.Kulvinder Singh Sehgal w/o Sh.Gaurav Johri, aged about 29 years, R/o H.No.306, Merigold, Mayfair Apartments, ...
Case Number: 949
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
K.L.M Royal Dutch Airlines Baggaga Services V/S Smt. Shashi
Court Name: Farrukhabad
Appelant Advocate Krishan kumar srivastava
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 07/2008( Date of Filing : 01 Feb 2008 )1. Smt. Shashi52/12 chitranjan park new delhi and branch at farrukhabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. K.L.M Royal Dutch Airlines Baggaga Servicesnew delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PRESENT:Krishan...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2022
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Manoharlal Wadhwani
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002Case No.CC/32/2016 Dated:In the matter of: SH. MANOHARLAL WADHWANI,11/25, EAST PATEL NAGAR,NEW DELHI-110008. ……..COMPLAINANTVERSUSKL...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
M/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES V/S RAJEEV MALIK
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. FAISAL NASEEM & MR. RITESH PARSHAD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 136 OF 20161. RAJEEV MALIKVILLAGE AND POST PHUGANA, TEHSIL BUDHANA,MUZAFFARNAGAR,U.P.-247776...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES(THROUGH ITS MD/ OFFICE INCHARGE) PRABHASH DEEP BU...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2016
Harmeet Singh V/S KLM Royal Dutch Airlines & anr.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.R. Takkar, R.K. Goyal & Shubhankar Baweja
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.:37 of 2015Date of Institution:28.08.2015Date of Decision:31.08.2015KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, (Airport Office), Room No.2, 4th Floor, Level-1, I.G.I. Airport, Delhi, through its authorized person.KL...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2015
VARUN KUMA TIWARI V/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIR SINGH PASRICH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2786 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/06/2012 in Appeal No. 141/2012 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINESThrough General Manager, 8th Floor, Tower C, Building No.8 DLF Cybe...
Case Number: 2786
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Royal Dutch Airlines in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Royal Dutch Airlines under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.