Restaurant
Latest Judgments
Total 379 Consumer Court Cases Against Restaurant.
PALAM TREE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT V/S DR MOHD AFROZ
Court Name: Aligarh
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
OrderComplainant has moved application under section 340 Crpc for lodging a complaint against S. Manmeet Singh, the chief executive Officer Palm Tree Hotel to prosecute U/s 193 IPC on the allegations of filing the tax invoice annexure 2 with supplementary affidavit after filing t...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2022
FUN N FOOD VILLAGE, (AN AMUSEMENT PARK AND RESTAURANT RUN BY POLO AMUSEMENT NAGPUR PVT. LTD.) V/S ASHOK JAGLAL JAISWAL
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate ADV. PRATEEK D. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/377/2022( Date of Filing : 27 May 2022 )1. ASHOK JAGLAL JAISWALR/O. GAURI SHANKAR JAISWAL LAYOUT, BUTIBORI, NAGPURNAGPURMAHARAS...
Case Number: 377
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2022
M/s McDonald's Restaurant V/S Rishabh Wadhera
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:349/2021Date of Institution:07.06.2021Date of Decision:25.08.2022Rishabh Wadhera aged 23 years # 3219, Sirhind, Fatehabad Sahib-140406. ... Complainant.VersusM/s McDonald’s Restaurant, 1...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
1. Mr. Shiv Sultania, M/S. EAst Inia Spiirits & Beer Distributors. (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Sankar Kumar Pradhan, Proprietor, Astha Restaurant -cum F.L. Bar.
Court Name: South 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionSouth 24 ParganasBaruipur , Kolkata - 700 144.Complaint Case No. CC/30/2019( Date of Filing : 28 Feb 2019 )1. Sankar Kumar Pradhan, Proprietor, Astha Restaurant -cum F.L. Bar. Vill- Bhagatpur, P.S. Pathar Pratima, Dist.- South 24- Pa...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2022
The Proprietor , Haveli Restaurant V/S Bidhu Bhusan Saha
Court Name: Maldah
Appelant Advocate In-persion
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MALDAHSatya Chowdhury Indoor Stadium,DSA Complex.PO. Dist.- MaldahWeb site - confonet.nic.inPhone Number - 03512-223582Complaint Case No. CC/49/2021( Date of Filing : 19 Aug 2021 )1. Bidhu Bhusan SahaS/o Basudev Saha, Joyguru Bhaba...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2021
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2022
The Manager, Bombay Shiv Sagar (Franchisee of Aditya Restaurant Pvt. Ltd.) V/S Navin Mittal
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Sumita Roy Chowdhury
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/137/2020( Date of Filing : 03 Sep 2020 )1. Navin MittalHastings Chambers,7C, Kiron Sankar Roy Road, 1st Floor, P.S. Hare Street, K...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2022
YUMI RESTAURANT (INDIA) PVT. LTD., V/S Anubhav Mittal
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rinku Bhatnagar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/140( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2020 )1. Anubhav MittalS/o Sh. Naresh Mittal R/o H.no. 352/35, Prem Nagar, Kath Mandi, Rohtak-124001............Complainant(s)Versus1. YUMI RESTAURANT (INDIA) PVT...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2022
Petercat Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bikash Kumar Singh
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Ld. Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/444/2021( Date of Filing : 24 Dec 2021 )1. Bikash Kumar SinghPurba Apartment, Ground Floor, Flat-A2, 42/1K, Prince Gulam Hossain S...
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2022
Sankalp Restaurant V/S Mr. P.R. Singhania
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/89/2018Date of Institution:08/02/2018Date of Decision:06/01/2022Mr.P.R.Singhania, H.No.3029, 2nd Floor, Ajanta Enclave, Sector-51D, Chandigarh-160047.… ComplainantV E R S U SSankalp ...
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2022
The Manager, Subway Restaurant V/S Shivangi
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gurneet Sagoo
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 544 OF 2021Shivangi Vs The Manager, Subway Restaurant & ors. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Gurneet Sagoo, Counsel for Compl...
Case Number: 544
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2021
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Restaurant in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Restaurant ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Restaurant under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.