
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.
Respondant Advocate Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/11/641. Yuvraj S BobadeMire Layout, Umred Road,NagpurMaharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shri Murlidhar Chavan, Sakka...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
United India Insurance Restaurant
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & K. RADHA
Respondant Advocate MR HARSH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1010 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/12/2011 in Appeal No. 913/2009 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. ABHIRUCHI RESTAURANTRep by its Sri S.V babu Reddy, H.no-7-274/4 DS Road, Secunderab...
Case Number: 1010
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
United India Insurance Restaurant
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & K. RADHA
Respondant Advocate MR. HARSH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1010 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/12/2011 in Appeal No. 913/2009 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. ABHIRUCHI RESTAURANTRep by its Sri S.V babu Reddy, H.no-7-274/4 DS Road, Secunderab...
Case Number: 1011
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 459 of 2012 1. Swarleen Kaur#257, BCW Surajpur, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula, D/o Late Sh. Satnam Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Kava R...
Case Number: 459
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate V. K. WASNIK
Respondant Advocate MADHAVI DAS
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2524 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/05/2011 in Appeal No. 2214/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. KANJI RESTAURANTIn Front of Polo Victory Cinema Station Road, Through: Its Manager Naveen Ku...
Case Number: 2524
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2013
Court Name: Medak
Appelant Advocate SRI.CH.LAXMI NARSIMHA REDDY
Respondant Advocate SRI.C.NARSINGH RAJ
CAUSE TITLE ANDJUDGEMENTComplaint Case No. CC/67/20111. D.BHIKSHAPATHI S/O RAJAJAHSHILAMPALLY (V), KOWDIPALLY (M), MEDAK DISTRICT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S TIRUMALA BAR RESTAURANT SANGAREDDYSANGAREDDY MEDAK DISTRICT............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. PATIL VITH...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/2421. C.V.AnilkumarS/o.V.P.Damodharan, Kottumoola, Thimiri.Po. 671313KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. K.P.Abdulla Licensee, Non-Vegitarian RestaurantRailway Station, KasaragodKasaragodKerala2. Station Master/Station ManagerRailway Station,...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MBS & CO
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/12/131. M/S BJRS, GALLOPS RESTAURANT RACE COURSE, MAHALAXMI MUMBAI MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. CONSUMER WELFARE ASSOCIATION 402 B-WING ASHOKA...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SACHIN MITTAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1999 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/03/2012 in Appeal No. 722/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NITIN MITTALS/o Sh Ved Prakash Mittal R/o C-2/132 Janak PuriNew Delhi - 110058Delhi...........Pet...
Case Number: 1999
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Restaurant in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Restaurant ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Restaurant under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.