
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate Rajasekaran and Rajkumar
Respondant Advocate H.D.Kumaravelu
Final Order1Final Order2Complaint Case No. CC/35/20131. V.LoganathanNo.75, Karunanithy Street, TMP Nagar, Padi, Chennai...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director, Anjappar RestaurantNo.239, Rue De Bussy, Puducherry............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN ...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-02-2016
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. Gaurav suneja
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/525/20151. Sh. Rohit Prabhakarvenkata seshasai prabhkahr purigindia 4 hennessy stret craigieburn...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Yam Restaurant Indiatower D 12 th floor golobal busines park dlf city -1 M.G Road Gurgaon............Opp.Party(s...
Case Number: 525
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2015
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/443/2015Date of Institution:16/07/2015Date of Decision:04/11/2015Navdeep Singh Nayyar s/o Paramjit Singh resident of House No.601/5, Manvata Nagar, Hoshiarpur.…..ComplainantV E R...
Case Number: 443
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate V.K.Sachdeva,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:442 of 2015Date of Institution:13.08.2015Date of Decision:28.10.2015Nitin Thatai s/o Sh.S.C.Thatai, Resident of House No.1061, Sector 12-A, Panchkula, Haryana. …..ComplainantVersusSwa...
Case Number: 442
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sunil Narang Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:19 of 2015Date of Institution:09.1.2015Date of Decision:29.09.2015Vikas Kuthiala S/o Sh. Kuldip Kuthiala R/o H. No. 105, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusYoChina Restauran...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sunil Narang
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/17/2015Date of Institution:09/01/2015Date of Decision:17/08/2015Vikas Kuthiala s/o Sh. Kuldip Kuthiala, resident of House No.105, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.…...........Complaina...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2015
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/146/20131. SURESH BABU.KVKIZHAKKE VEETTIL HOUSE TIRUR POST THAZHEPALAM VADAKKE ANNARAMALAPPURAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PRASANTH FAMILY RESTAURANTUP HILL MALAPPURAMMALAPPURAM2. KINLEY MINERAL WATER70/JO...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2015
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate k.k malik
Respondant Advocate r.n sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 4001. mukesh gulia son of dayanandr/o bank colony bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. eaza restaurant hansi gate bhiwanihansi gate bhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Budh Dev Yadav PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Balraj Singh MEMBERHON...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2015
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate SHRI ANIL KAMBLE
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KRISHNAYAN SEN & MR. RISHAD A. CHOWDHURY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1719 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/01/2014 in Appeal No. 964/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MCDONALD'S FAMILY RESTAURANT(CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD) CRYSTAL PALM , PLOT NO-2, S...
Case Number: 1719
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Restaurant in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Restaurant ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Restaurant under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.