company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

NCDRC

AMBIKA & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLLAM

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2014 IN RP/4796/20131. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KOLLAM...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMBIKA & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRES...

Case Number: 355

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2014

NCDRC

RAMAKANT SHUKLA V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KANPUR

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAVANATH MAHANTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3104 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 1207/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KANPURASSTT. P.F COMMISSIONER-LEGAL,DELHI, 28 BHAVI...

Case Number: 3104

|

Date of Filing: 30-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2014

Maharashtra

Machindra Dhondiba Kambale V/S The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A S Kanaki

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/13/305(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/08/2013 in Case No. 527/2010 of District Solapur)1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Regional Office, Pune Cantonment Board Building...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MANJULABEN KALIDAS RAVAL V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. BALRAJ DEWAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 903 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 09/10/2013 in Appeal No. 608/2009 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERPROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION BHAVISHYNIDHI BHAVAN, INCOME TAX...

Case Number: 903

|

Date of Filing: 27-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2014

NCDRC

HATTI VEERARAJAN & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2239

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

NCDRC

S.V GAJENDRA & ANR V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2240

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

NCDRC

S.M NARAYANA SWAMY, & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2241

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

NCDRC

SMT.K.V JYOTHIR BHANU & ANR. V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2242

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

NCDRC

SRI SANNAIAH & ANR V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2243

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

NCDRC

K.R SHRINIVAS RAO V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MANCHANDA & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/06/2013 in Appeal No. 587/2013 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/3353/2014,IA/3354/2014,IA/3355/20141. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERSub Regional...

Case Number: 2244

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.