Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Samrath Mahajan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
This Commission appreciate the efforts made by Counsel for both the parties in getting this complaint settled. It is agreed that the Opposite Parties i.e. M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited shall make payment of amount deposited by the complainant with them alongwith interest ...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jasveer Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yash Pal Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
This Commission appreciate the efforts made by Counsel for both the parties in getting this complaint settled. It is agreed that the Opposite Parties i.e. M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited shall make payment of amount deposited by the complainant with them alongwith interest @7.5...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr. Ashok Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/15/20161. Mr. Ashok KumarH.No. 37, Village Jagatpur Bajaj, Amritsar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd.SCO No. 6-8, 1st & 2nd Floor, Sector 9D, Chandigarh 16009............Opp.Party...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vikas Yadav
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil, Varsha Rana, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:258 of 2015Date of Institution:02.11.2015Date of Decision:26.04.2016Vikas Yadav son of Sh. Padam Kant, Resident of A-24, Officers Mess, 12 wing, Air Force Station, Chandigarh.……Complain...
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Pankaj Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajat Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:309 of 2015Date of Institution:18.12.2015Date of Decision:26.04.2016Mr. Pankaj Garg son of Late Sh. Pawan Kumar Garg R/o Flat No.17, GH-3, Mansa Devi Complex, Sector 5, Panchkula, Haryana.…&hel...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sahil Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
On account of some technical defect, Sh. Arun Kumar, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint, with liberty to file a fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Ordered accordingly. It is made clear that the period taken during pend...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vivek Vermani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:264 of 2015Date of Institution:05.11.2015Date of Decision:22.04.20161. Vivek Vermani S/o Sh. S. M. Vermani R/o House No.69 Green Avenue, Amritsar, Punjab.2. Seema Vermani W/o Sh. Vivek Vermani R/o H...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Dr. Sudha Mirchia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh.Varun Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant states that in view of pendency of appeal in the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, let this Execution Application be allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to file a fres...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajinder Kumar Dhingra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/249/20151. Rajinder Kumar DhingraPanchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.New Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER...
Case Number: 249
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Jarnail Singh Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yash Pal Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:255 of 2015Date of Institution:29.10.2015Date of Decision:20.04.2016Jarnail Singh Sandhu resident of House No.133, Sector 70, Mohali – Punjab.……Complainant.VersusM/s Puma Realtors ...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.