Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Mr. Haravtar Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil Adv. & Rajat Chopra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file the same before the competent Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to prepare one photocopy of the main...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Rajinder Chaudhary
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the partie...
Case Number: 604
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
PUMA Realtors V/S Rajinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh, Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:150 of 2016Date of Institution:20.04.2016Date of Decision:20.09.2016Rajinder Singh s/o Late Sh. Ajit Singh R/o House No.1179, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh.Bhajan Kaur w/o Sh. Rajinder Singh, r/o House No.1...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Mohinder Singh Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:237 of 2016Date of Institution:27.05.2016Date of Decision:19.09.2016Mohinder Singh Bajaj S/o Sh. Harbans Singh Bajaj R/o House No.63, Sector 9-A, Chandigarh.……Complainant.VersusM/s Puma ...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Karan Pal Kandhari
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Munish Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:236 of 2016Date of Institution:27.05.2016Date of Decision:15.09.2016Sh. Karan Pal Kandhari s/o Late Krishan Kant Kandhari r/o H.No.HM 65, FF, Phase IV, SAS Nagar (Mohali).……Complainant.V...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Sarbjit Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:226 of 2016Date of Institution:23.05.2016Date of Decision:14.09.2016Sarbjit Singh son of Sh.Achhra SinghCorrespondence Address:- R/o VPO Gowara, Tehsil Malerkotla, District Sangrur, Punjab.…&he...
Case Number: 226
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Jarnail Singh Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yash Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:173 of 2016Date of Institution:29.04.2016Date of Decision:02.09.2016Jarnail Singh Sandhu S/o S. Dharam Singh Sandu, resident of House No.2130, First Floor, Sector 79, Mohali – Punjab.…&he...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Lt. Col. Dalvinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:230 of 2016Date of Institution:24.05.2016Date of Decision:02.09.2016Lt. Col. Dalvinder Singh, Aged 54 years son of Sh. Pritpal Singh, resident of House No.242 R, Model Town, Ludhiana.……C...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S Timple Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/95/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/10/20161. Timple JainPatiala............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd,Chandigarh............Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRE...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Sahil Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:206 of 2016Date of Institution:12.05.2016Date of Decision:23.08.2016Sahil Jain, Aged 24 years s/o Sh. Sanjiv Jain, R/o House No.267, Adarsh Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. At present residing in House No.29...
Case Number: 206
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.