Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors V/S Mrs. Mansi Khanna
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On 08.12.2017, following order was passed by this Commission:-“Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors states that due to communication gap, drafts could not be prepared, instead, he has handed over four post-dated cheques, all dated 27.12.2017, i.e. two chequ...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagbir Kaur Brar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Party raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint, at th...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vinod Kumar Thakur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jamaluddin Ansari, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Party that to calculate pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission, when we look into the total price of the unit, in question, and the relief claimed, the total amount will e...
Case Number: 519
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., V/S Arun Kumar Goel
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that the relief claims including price of the unit, in question, will go beyond Rs.1 Crore. Faced with this situation, Ms. Narender Kaur, Advocate, Counsel for the co...
Case Number: 683
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mohit Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
The complainants are seeking refund of amount paid with interest @15% p.a. At the time of arguments, very serious objection was raised by Sh.Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that when complaint was filed, the amount involved to determine pecuniary jurisdiction of...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bhushan Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that this Commission has no jurisdiction to try this complaint because when the complaint was filed, the amount claimed i.e. price of the unit, interest, compensation...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
M/s. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.(An IREO Group Company) having its Registered Office at No. 5, Dhanraj C V/S Mr. Navtej Johar,
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 440 OF 2013Navtej Johar Vs M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Proxy counsel for Sh....
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
M/s puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. (An IREO Group Company) having its Registered Office at No. 5, Dhanraj C V/S Mr. Arvind Chaudhary son of sh. Madan Mohan Chaudhary
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 441 OF 2013Arvind Chaudhary Vs M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Proxy counsel for...
Case Number: 441
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
Puma Realtors V/S Bal V.Sehgal
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 487 OF 2013Bal V.Sehgal & Anr. Vs M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainants.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Pro...
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Savita Dhingra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed by this Commission :-“Sh. Rajesh Dhingra, Decree Holder No.2 states that the judgment debtors have remitted a sum of Rs.9,02,342/- against the bounced cheques, which is inclusive of Rs.40,000/-, on account of penalty, ...
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.