company-name-logo

Post Office

Latest Judgments

Total 3344 Consumer Court Cases Against Post Office.

Haryana

HED POST OFFICE V/S SADA NAND

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR TAYA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 863 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018Sada Nand son of Shri Ram Dutt son of Shri Hazari Lal, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehsil Ballah, District Karnal. Appel...

Case Number: 863

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S NIRMALA

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR TAYA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 861 to 870 and 996 & 997 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017 and 17.08.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018F.A. No.861 of 2017Satish Kumar son of Shri Ram Dutt, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehs...

Case Number: 864

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S PIRTHI

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR TAYA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 865 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018Pirthi son of Shri Ghasi Ram, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehsil Ballah, District Karnal. Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. ...

Case Number: 865

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S BIRMI DEVI

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR TAYA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 861 to 870 and 996 & 997 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017 and 17.08.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018F.A. No.861 of 2017Satish Kumar son of Shri Ram Dutt, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehs...

Case Number: 867

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S RAM DUTT

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.K.TAYAL

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 861 to 870 and 996 & 997 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017 and 17.08.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018F.A. No.861 of 2017Satish Kumar son of Shri Ram Dutt, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehs...

Case Number: 869

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S SAFAL JOON

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.K.TAYAL

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 870 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018Safal Joon (minor) son of Shri Jatinder, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehsil Ballah, District Karnal, minor through his g...

Case Number: 870

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S SOMBIR

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SANDEEP SINGH

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 861 to 870 and 996 & 997 of 2017Date of Institution: 20.07.2017 and 17.08.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018F.A. No.861 of 2017Satish Kumar son of Shri Ram Dutt, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehs...

Case Number: 996

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

Haryana

HEAD POST OFFICE V/S MUKESH RANI

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SANDEEP SINGH

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 997 of 2017Date of Institution: 17.08.2017Date of Decision : 26.09.2018Mukesh Rani wife of Shri Ram Kumar, resident of Village Kurlan, Tehsil Ballah, District Karnal. Appellant-ComplainantVer...

Case Number: 997

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2018

NCDRC

SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE & 2 ORS. V/S KISHORE CHANDRA SAHU

Post Office  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA & ANANTTIKA SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1161 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 13/07/2017 in Appeal No. 283/2001 of the State Commission Orissa)1. KISHORE CHANDRA SAHUS/O. RATHA SAHU, R/O. VILLAGE RAMPUR, PO. CHHATIA, P.S. TANGI,DISTRICT-CUTTA...

Case Number: 1161

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Jaipal V/S Post Office

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh

Respondant Advocate Alok Sinha

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/764( Date of Filing : 10 Apr 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Post Officea...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 08-10-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Post Office in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Post Office ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Post Office under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.