company-name-logo

Pepsico

Latest Judgments

Total 181 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.

Uttar Pradesh

Jai Prakash Yadav V/S Pepsico India Holding Pvt Ltd

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Kumar Ayush

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/2056( Date of Filing : 02 Dec 2005 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pepsico India Holding Pvt Ltda.......

Case Number: 2005

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2005

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Baijnath Pandey V/S Pepsico India

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Kumar Ayush

Respondant Advocate P.K.Singh

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/950( Date of Filing : 01 Sep 2004 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pepsico IndiaKanpur Nagar.............

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2004

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Prem Chandra V/S M/s Pepsico Company India Holding

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh, Kumar Ayush

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/3055( Date of Filing : 01 Dec 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/s Pepsico Company India Holdinga...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-2003

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Prem Das Shiv Hare V/S Pepsico

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/485( Date of Filing : 24 Mar 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Pepsico a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Prem Das S...

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2018

Jammu and Kashmir

PEPSICO INDIA LTD. V/S SOURABH ANAND

Pepsico  

Court Name: Jammu

Appelant Advocate AK SAWHNEY

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM JAMMU(Constituted under J&K Consumer Protection Act1987) .Case File No 83/DFJDate of Institution 05/06/2013Date of Decision 14/02/2018Sourabh AnandS/O Sh.Naresh AnandR/O Qtr.No.9 New PlotsJammu. Complainant V/S1.Pepsi Co.India Head O...

Case Number: 300

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-02-2018

Chandigarh

Mr. Navdeep Singh Nayyar V/S M/s PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathee, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Respondent in person

At the time of arguments, it is stated that the parties have settled the issue and in view of that, Sh.Navdeep Singh Nayyar, respondent No.1/complainant wishes to withdraw his complaint bearing No.187 of 2016 filed before District Forum-II, UT, Chandigarh. In view of above, the a...

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2017

Punjab

M/s Pepsico India V/S Parshotam K Garg Advocate

Pepsico  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. RBT/CC/16/1971. Parshotam K Garg Advocater/o House No67 Ward No.13 Khanauri Mandi Tehsil Moonak SangrurPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Pepsico Indiaholding pvt ltd vill Ali Asgarpur P O Ganjba...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2017

Chandigarh

Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bansun

Pepsico  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 194 OF 2016in CC/470/2015Bansun Vs Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Limited and another BEFORE: S.S.PANESAR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, ...

Case Number: 194

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-04-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Pepsico India Holding V/S Rajendra Prasad Pandey

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Gopal

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/58/2017InFirst Appeal No. A/2012/22441. Rajendra Prasad PandeyUnnao...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Pepsico India Holding Unnao.........

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s PepsiCo India V/S Manish Kumar

Pepsico  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Harsh Nagra Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :15/02/2017ORDER Sh. Harsh Nagra, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would ...

Case Number: 159

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-02-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.