company-name-logo

Pepsico

Latest Judgments

Total 181 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.

Uttar Pradesh

Sardar Jaswinder Singh V/S Pepsico India Holdings

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas singh

Respondant Advocate B.K. Sirivastav 2.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/2162( Date of Filing : 27 Dec 2010 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Wadhwa Bakersa...........Appellant...

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-02-2020

Tamil Nadu

R. PRADEEP KUMAR V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT LTD.,

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M. KANDASAMY

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/19/2015( Date of Filing : 28 Jan 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT LTD.,DLF CORPORATE PARK, S.BLOCK QUOTOB ENCLAVE, PHASE III, GUARGON 122 002............Appellant(s)Versus1. R. PRADEEP KUMAR...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2020

Uttar Pradesh

Ghansyam Bind V/S Pepsico India Holding Pvt

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1108/2016( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/07/2015 in Case No. C/171/2014 of District Jaunpur)1. Pepsico India Holding...

Case Number: 1108

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2019

Maharashtra

Pepsico INdia V/S Noor Mohammad Peer Mohammad

Pepsico  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Parvez Opai

Respondant Advocate

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNew Administrative Building No.-13rd Floor, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001Ph.0712-2546884Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/18/7371. Noor Mohammad Peer Mohammadr/o Tajnagar Teka NagpurNagpurMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-11-2019

Delhi

PEPSICO INDIA V/S AKANSHA

Pepsico  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 565/16Ms. Akanksha SrivastavaD/o Shri Amit SrivastavaF-25, Sector-56Noida, Uttar Pradesh …….ComplainantVs.S...

Case Number: 565

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2019

Tamil Nadu

Pepsico holdings India Pvt Ltd & others V/S P.Sakthivel

Pepsico  

Court Name: South Chennai

Appelant Advocate P.Chandrasekaran & others

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing : 25.08.2011 Date of Order : 11.04.2019DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M...

Case Number: 248

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 17-06-2019

Chandigarh

Chetan Sharma V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2019

Chandigarh

Anshul Goel V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...

Case Number: 190

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2019

Haryana

Pepsico India Holdings V/S Shantanu Saini

Pepsico  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Complainant in person

Respondant Advocate Sh. Deepak Jain

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 616/2017( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2017 )1. Shantanu Saini S/o Sh. Rajesh Saini R/o H.No. 777/19 Aimirash Factory Saini Gali Arya Nagar, Green Road, Gali No.9 Rohtak............Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 616

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2019

Chandigarh

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. V/S Deepak Nagar

Pepsico  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/338/2017Date of Institution:20/04/2017Date of Decision:21/12/2018Deepak Nagar son of Sh. Mahipal Singh Nagar, Resident of Village Sarangpur, U.T. Chandigarh.……… ...

Case Number: 338

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-12-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.