
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Amit Kr. Muhuri
Respondant Advocate Mr. Debesh Halder.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Revision Petition No. RP/145/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/07/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/273/2016 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.Kolkata R...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2017
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh Robin Budhiraja
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/284/20161. Sachin Jain S/o Kashmiri LalR/o NK-11,Daulat Ram Street Bazar NahrianJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 284
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2017
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate SHRI. M. S. DURUGKAR
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/345/20161. DR. RAKESH GOVINDAS SHAHR/O. C/O. ARUN MEHTA, GANGABAI GHAT ROAD, NAGPUR Nagpur Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 345
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2017
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh Suteekshan Samrol
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/67/20171. Navjot Singh S/o S Darshan SinghR/o 84,New Jawahar NagarJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2017
Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/20/20171. Somenath DasS/O Late Haripada Das,17A Aswini Nagar, Post Office Regent Park, P.S.-Jadavpur, Kol-40............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Panason...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2017
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/596/20161. Vikas Kumaraged about 41 years S/o Satpal S/o Parmasri Dass R/o KC Road Proprietor of M/s Samsung Plaza BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt Ltd1.Panasonic India Pvt Ltd Plot No.80,Industrial Ar...
Case Number: 596
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
Court Name: Tarn Taran
Appelant Advocate H.S Sandhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,TARN TARANNEAR FCI GODOWN,MURADPURAComplaint Case No. CC/27/20171. Gurpreet Singh S.o Mangal singh R.o vill chamba kalan Teh And DisttTarn TaranPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic IndiaSPIC BUILDING ANNEXE 6th floor No.88 m...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2017
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/595/20161. SatpalS/o Parmasri Dass R/o BXI/639, Pharwahi Bazar BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt Ltd1.Panasonic India Pvt Ltd Plot No.80,Industrial Area,Phase 2, Ramdarbar Chandigarh 160002 through its ...
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Retesh Mohindru Adv.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Complaint No: 35 dated 17.01.2017. Date of decision: 12.07.2017.Vishal Pathak Advocate S/o. Sh. Harinder Pal Pathak, R/o. H. No.B-31/6810, New Preet Nagar, Tibba Road, Ludhiana. ..… Complainant Versus1. Pa...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DCDRF North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Execution Application No. EA/17/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/468/20141. Arpita Chanda 18/A, Dayal Krishna Mukherjee Road, Alam Bazar, Kolkata-700035. ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Zen World, Authorized Service provider of Panasonic ...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.